香港特区法院的违基审查权兼与董立坤、张淑钿二位教授商榷

李树忠,姚国建

香港特区法院的违基审查权兼与董立坤、张淑钿二位教授商榷

Power of HKSAR Courts to Review Legislation for Conformity with the Basic Law


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:李树忠,姚国建
    单位:中国政法大学;中国政法大学
    中文关键词:香港特别行政区基本法;违基审查权;基本法解释权
    英文关键词:the Basic Law of HKSAR;power to review legislation for conformity with the Basic Law;interpretation of the Basic Law
    中文摘要:
    特区立法机关应根据基本法制定法律,特区法院审查特区立法机关制定的法律是否违反基本法的权力被称为“违基审查权”。香港的普通法传统为特区法院的违基审查权提供了法理依据,特区的新法治秩序激活了普通法中法院的司法审查权,而全国人大常委会审查权的不完整性使特区法院的违基审查成为必要。司法实践表明,特区法院的违基审查权无法挑战全国人大常委会的审查权,对基本法的实施总体上是有利的;损害特区行政主导体制的主要因素并非是法院的违基审查,而是立法会的强势地位。作为植根于普通法传统、已有十多年运行实践的权力,特区法院的违基审查权无须再通过全国人大常委会释法确认。当然,基于其在特区法治秩序中的地位,特区法院违基审查权应受到特区外部与内部两方面的制约。
    英文摘要:
    The Basic Law of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) enjoys a higher status than the legislation by the Legislative Council of HKSAR. The power of the courts in HKSAR to review whether the legislation by the Legislative Council conforms to the Basic Law is called the “Power to Review Legislation for Conformity with the Basic Law”. The common law tradition in Hong Kong provides the legal basis for this power, and the new legal order in HKSAR activates the judicial review power of the courts. Moreover, the incompleteness of the review by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (SCNPC) makes it necessary for the courts in HKSAR to review the legislation for conformity with the Basic Law.The practice of HKSAR courts shows that the power to review legislation for conformity with the Basic Law does not challenge the authority of SCNPC. It is generally helpful for the implementation of the Basic Law. It is not the courts’ reviewing practice that harms the executive-dominated political structure, but the strong position of the Legislative Council. The viewpoint that the reviewing practice distorts the relationship between the Basic Law and common law is based on a misunderstanding of their relationship. As a power founded on the tradition of common law that has been practiced for more than ten years, it is not necessary for the SCNPC to recognize it by interpreting the Basic Law. Of course, due to their status in the legal order of HKSAR, the courts’ power to review legislation for conformity with the Basic Law shall be subject to both external and internal constraints from outside and inside the HKSAR.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成