刑事诉讼法时间效力规则研究

聂友伦

刑事诉讼法时间效力规则研究

On the Rules of Temporal Effect of Criminal Procedure Law


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:聂友伦
    单位:中国人民大学刑事法律科学研究中心
    中文关键词:程序从新;法律即行适用;法不溯及既往;信赖保护
    英文关键词:applying new procedure law; the immediate application of laws; the non-retroactivity of laws; reliance protection
    中文摘要:
    我国刑事诉讼立法及相关规范未对刑事诉讼法的时间效力问题予以明确,使得法秩序变迁下刑事程序的新旧流转出现了规范适用疑难。对此,学界通常认为应当适用程序从新原则,但相关理解与界说存在问题。在规范论上,基于法律即行适用与法不溯及既往,可以推导出刑事诉讼法的时间效力适用行为时法原则。对于尚未终结的诉讼,因新程序与旧事实可能无法相容,适用行为时法难免对旧事实造成影响,但这只是不真正溯及,不违反法不溯及既往原则。在立法论上,除应明确行为时法原则外,由于法律的不真正溯及仍可能实质损害法不溯及既往背后的法安定性及信赖保护原则,立法者宜通过信赖利益保护理论,预先识别需要保护的信赖利益,继而选择适当的立法方案将此类例外纳入刑事诉讼法体系。
    英文摘要:
    The Chinese Criminal Procedure Law and related regulations have not clarified the rules on the temporal effect of the application of the law, resulting in difficulties in the transition of criminal procedures from these under the old law to those under the new law. With respect to this issue, the academic circle believes that the principle of applying new procedure law should be applied, but related understandings and definitions are problematic. In terms of normativism, it can be deduced from the principle of immediate application of laws and the principle of non-retroactivity of laws that the law in force at the time when the act is committed should be applied in criminal procedures. For unfinished lawsuits, because the procedures under the new law may not be compatible with the old procedural facts, the application of the law in force at the time when the act is committed will inevitably affect these incompatible old facts, but this is only non-authentic retroactivity, and does not violate the principle of non-retroactivity of laws. However, the non-authentic retroactivity of criminal procedure law may still substantially damage the legal certainty and legitimate expectation, which are exactly the values to be protected by the principle of non-retroactivity of laws. Legislators should follow the thinking path constructed by the theory of legitimate expectation to identify the reliance interests that needs to be paid attention to in advance, and then choose an appropriate legislative plan to incorporate such exceptions into the legal system of criminal procedure.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成