公共性视角下的互联网平台反垄断规制
张晨颖公共性视角下的互联网平台反垄断规制
Anti-monopoly Regulation of Internet Platforms from the Perspective of Publicness
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：张晨颖
单位：
中文关键词：互联网平台;反垄断;公共性;竞争性义务;公共性滥用
英文关键词：internet platform; anti-monopoly; publicness; competitive obligation; abuse of publicness
中文摘要：
互联网平台经历了三重进化，已然成为集信息汇集、要素生产、资源配置、规则制定为一体的新型经济中枢，是相关主体共同创造价值的组织形态，发挥着以多产业融合为特征的生态功能。平台重塑经济生产的过程和组织样态，改变资源配置的方式，成为政治权力和市场权利之间的第三力量。平台经济呈现出与传统经济不同的竞争特点，对全球的反垄断监管提出了技术上、规则上、法理上的挑战，在本质上是平台对社会经济的渗透力日益深刻，平台的公共性突显。但由于缺乏有效监管，平台的公共性异化造成竞争扭曲进而导致垄断，具体体现为数据要素、平台要素的非开放、非中立。为匡正竞争秩序，有必要革新反垄断制度，建立以“滥用公共性”为底层逻辑的规则，对适格的平台经营者设立竞争性义务，以促进创新，保护平台相关者的合法权利。
英文摘要：
After experiencing three stages of evolution, internet platforms have become new economic hubs with such functions as information accumulation, element production, resource allocation and rule making. They are an organizational form that enables the relevant entities to jointly create value, and plays the ecological function characterized by integration of multiple industries. Internet platforms reshape the process and organizational form of economic production, changes the method of resource allocation, and becomes the third force other than political power and market rights. Internet platform economy is different from traditional economy in terms of competition features, posing challenges to global anti-monopoly regulation in technique, rules and juridical logic. In essence, this is the result of the increasing penetration by internet platforms into social economy, and the transformation of their nature from private to public. Because of the lack of efficient regulation, the dissimilation of the public nature of platforms has led to the distortion of competition and monopoly, concretely manifested in the non-openness and non-neutrality of data elements and platform elements. In order to restore the competition order, promote innovation and protect the rights of internet platform participants, it is necessary to reform the current anti-monopoly system, establish anti-monopoly rules with “abusing of publicness” as the underlying logic, and impose competitive liabilities on competent internet platform operators.
全文阅读： 点击下载
