公共政策合法性供给机制与走向以医改进程为中心的考察

马长山

公共政策合法性供给机制与走向以医改进程为中心的考察

Legitimacy Supply Mechanism and Tendency in the Process of Medical Reform


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:马长山
    单位:华东政法大学
    中文关键词:医改进程;公共政策;合法性供给;法治秩序
    英文关键词:process of medical reform;public policy;legitimacy supply;legal order
    中文摘要:
    公共政策合法性不仅是一个重要的法治理论问题,也是法治秩序得以形成的重要变量。三十年来的“医改”进程表明,公共领域正在中国蓬勃兴起,并促进了公共政策合法性供给机制的时代转向,即从内部创议走向社会动员、从公众默认走向价值回归、从符合真理观走向共识真理观、从中心的内部循环走向中心与边缘的双向互动,展现着中国公共政策的重要民主化变革。虽然其中还存在着某些需要解决的问题,但它无疑构成了对多元和谐秩序的关键支撑和推进民主法治建设的新兴动力。
    英文摘要:
    The legitimacy of public policy is not only an important issue in the legal theory, but also a significant variable in the formation of the legal order. Policy evolution of China’s medical reform in the past 30 years indicates that the public sphere is in a boom in China, which has promoted the transformation of the legitimacy supply mechanism of public policy to a new age.Firstly, the mechanism has transformed from the previous model of “internal decision” to the mode of “social engagement”, that is, to entrust some non-governmental organizations to develop medical reform plans and deliver the plans to the public for discussion, which can make the public policy formulation process full of brainstorm, critical reflection, dialogue, interactive debates and consultations, create a powerful “public opinion field”, and promote the decision-making pattern to the contemporary democratic type. Secondly, the mechanism has transformed from the mode of “public default” to the mode of “value regression”. The decision-making authority has altered the traditional mode of “leaders command, the masses follow”, but based the decision on people’s demand and the practice of social development, and human rights have been attached great importance to in public policy. Thirdly, the mechanism has transformed from the “correspondence theory of truth” to the “consensus theory of truth”. The decision-making authority delivered the reform plans to the public for the “uncertain” dialogue and consultation, and balanced the multiple and complex interests, thus has formed the inclusive consensus, value standard and policy orientation on the basis of diversity and dialogue. Fourthly, an open policy center has been established in the government, which no longer plays the traditional role of deciding direction, but does more on leading the public appeal. Thus the public appeal can work around this policy center and form a two-way interaction, and show the important democratization power of China’s public policy. Although there are still some matters to be resolved, it is certain that it has become a key support to the multiple harmonious order and a new force promoting the development of democracy and the rule of law.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成