诉讼标的之本土路径

严仁群

诉讼标的之本土路径

Native Approach on Object of Action in Civil Procedure


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:严仁群
    单位:南京大学法学院
    中文关键词:诉讼标的;EOS案;事件说;竞合合并
    英文关键词:object of action;the EOS case;the transaction theory;alternative joinder of claims
    中文摘要:
    美、德、日等国已在诉讼标的问题上作出了明确选择,而我国实务仍呈纷乱状态,至少有三条路径并存。既往的标的论低估了新、旧说之差异,高估了新说一次性解决纠纷之功效,诉讼标的相对论对新、旧说之折中并不合理。事件说在纠纷的一次性解决上最为彻底,而其缺陷其他诸说也有。国内法院普遍排斥竞合合并、预备合并,现行法苛待诉的变更,多数当事人系本人诉讼,故本土目前不具备采新说、事件说和相对论的条件,最高人民法院的新路径也不可采,只能采旧说。但应通过释明等措施尽力减少其负面效果,并朝新说乃至事件说努力。
    英文摘要:
    It is very difficult to define the object of action, but it is not a question without answer. All the representative countries in both common law system and continent law system have made their definite choice about it. Our judicial practice is chaotic in this aspect. Many courts hold on the traditional route, but the Supreme Court deviate from the tradition in the EOS case and the Kunpeng case, and the opinion in those two cases are different from each other. This disorder should be ended.Continent law system has not noticed the transaction theory in the American law. According to the transaction theory, the plaintiff should present all the claims arising out of the same transaction. The transaction theory reminds us that, the difference between the old theory and the new one are not confined to their attitudes to the concurrent substantive rights. The new theory is not thoroughly in solving the dispute once for all, for it cannot prevent the claimant from re-litigating on the different claim from the non-concurrent rights. The relative theory omits the benefit of the defendant and the rational use of judicial resources. Although the transaction theory is not perfect, its defect is common in all the theories.Our courts reject the alternative joinder of claims, and most of them also oppose the hypothetical joinder. Our Civil Procedural Law is strict with the amendment of complaint, the pretrial procedure cannot help parties to dig out facts sufficiently, the quality of judges is not high, and most of parties cannot hire lawyers. All these reality factors determine that we have no condition to adopt the transaction theory, the new theory or the relative one. It is the unique choice to adopt the old theory at present, but we should make efforts to adopt the new theory and the transaction theory in the future.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成