故意杀人罪的手段残忍及其死刑裁量——以刑事指导案例为对象的研究

陈兴良

故意杀人罪的手段残忍及其死刑裁量——以刑事指导案例为对象的研究

Cruelness of Method in the Crime of Intentional Homicide and its Sentencing of Death Penalty


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:陈兴良
    单位:北京大学法学院
    中文关键词:故意杀人罪;手段残忍;死刑裁量
    英文关键词:crime of intentional homicide;cruelness of method;sentencing of death penalty
    中文摘要:
    故意杀人罪在死刑适用案件中占有较大比重,其死刑裁量对于减少和控制死刑具有重要意义。而手段残忍是司法实践中故意杀人罪死刑裁量的重要因素,并且独立于故意杀人罪的情节严重、情节恶劣以及后果严重等评价性用语。通过对十个被司法机关认定为故意杀人手段残忍的典型案例的探讨,可以认为故意杀人罪的手段残忍是指,在杀人过程中,故意折磨被害人,致使被害人死亡之前处于肉体与精神的痛苦状态。司法实践中存在着将故意杀人罪的手段残忍与情节严重、情节恶劣以及后果严重等评价性用语相混淆的现象,致使故意杀人罪的手段残忍内容宽泛,沦为一句法律套语。故意杀人罪的死刑裁量应当主要从案件性质、犯罪情节、犯罪后果、主观恶性和人身危险性等四个方面进行考量。
    英文摘要:
    The crime of intentional homicide is a felony in Chinese Criminal Code and is a crime most frequently imposed by death penalty. Therefore, the sentencing of the death penalty for the crime of intentional homicide is very significant for the reduction and control of the death penalty. By taking an empirical method, this paper chooses ten cases which were found by the courts to be intentional homicide with cruel methods from The General Comment on the Rationale of Decisions of Criminal Guiding Cases by People's Court and makes an analysis on the judicial assessment of the cruelness of method in the crime of intentional homicide.This paper argues that, the so-called cruelness of method in the crime of intentional homicide means that the killer intentionally excruciates the victim during the process of homicide, which causes physical and mental suffering to the victim before the death. This paper also argues that, the demarcation line between the cruelness of method and such evaluative words as the gravity of circumstances, the vileness of circumstances as well as the seriousness of result has been blurred in our judicial practice, which has led to the generalization of the cruelness of method in the crime of intentional homicide and even become a legal stereotype. Thus this paper tries to specify and classify the cruelness of method in the crime of intentional homicide. This paper finally makes a systematic analysis on the sentencing of the death penalty in the crime of intentional homicide from the following aspects, i. e., the nature of the case, the circumstances of the offense, the result of the offense, and the subjective evil and personal dangerousness.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成