法治评估模式辨异
钱弘道,杜维超法治评估模式辨异
Distinguishing Between Two Modes of Assessment of Rule of Law
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：钱弘道,杜维超
单位：浙江大学法学院,浙江大学法学院
中文关键词：法治评估;法治指数;国家治理;行政管理;法治评估模式
英文关键词：assessment of rule of law;index of rule of law;state governance;administration;modes of assessment
中文摘要：
法治评估对法治社会建设具有重大作用,但当前我国理论界对法治评估体系的一元化构想并不完备,忽视了我国法治评估实践中两种话语模式的分化.两种法治评估类型的理论基点,分别是以治理功能为核心的实验主义治理理论和以管理功能为核心的公共行政管理理论.两种评估模式在方法、目标、主体和后果上均存在着结构性的差异.必须严格区分两种评估模式,通过区隔和整合方法,建立二阶性、一体化的法治评估体系,以实现法治评估效果的最佳化.
英文摘要：
The assessment of the rule of law is of great significance to the construction of a society under the rule of law, but the unified theory of the rule-of-law assessment system in China is imperfect. The polysemy of the concept of rule of law leads to the separation of two modes of discourses in China's rule of law evaluation practice. These two modes of assessment are respectively based on a governance-centered experimental governance theory and an administration-centered public administration theory, and are respectively constitutive and evolvable in methodology, closed and open-ended in purpose, unitary and diverse in subject, and utilitarian and functional in consequence. So, their functional roles must be strictly distinguished from each other, and their stages of application should be segregated on the basis of their qualities. Horizontal synthesis and horizontal cooperation should be established between the two modes, and a two-order but integrated assessment system should be established in order to optimize the outcome of assessment.
全文阅读： 点击下载
