归责视野下共同犯罪的区分制与单一制

何庆仁

归责视野下共同犯罪的区分制与单一制

The Differentiating System and the Single System of Joint Crimefrom the Perspective of Imputation


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:何庆仁
    单位:中国青年政治学院法学院
    中文关键词:共同犯罪;区分制;单一制;共同归责;单独归责
    英文关键词:joint crime;differentiating system;single system;common imputation;single imputation
    中文摘要:
    我国刑法总则"共同犯罪"一节采取的是区分制还是单一制,近年来学界的争论颇多。但是,这些争论大多围绕条文规定本身展开,而未深入到对共同犯罪归责基础的分析。实际上,在区分制与单一制日渐趋同的今天,仅从是否区分了正犯与共犯,或者是否区分了定罪与量刑等方面,已经很难准确界定区分制与单一制。只有引入归责的视角,才能看到单一制的单独归责模式给不法概念的内涵带来的深层次问题。我国刑法规定主犯与从犯的立法采纳的是共同归责模式,并且区分了共同归责的核心人物与边缘人物。就此而言,我国刑法总则"共同犯罪"一节采取的是归责意义上的区分制。
    英文摘要:
    In recent years, there have been a lot of debates in China over the question of whether the section on joint crimes in Chinese Criminal Law has established a differentiating system or a single system. However, most of these debates have been carried out around the text of the related provisions in the Criminal Law and there are very few in-depth analyses of the imputation basis of joint crime. Today, in a time of increasing convergence between the differentiating system and the single system, it is very difficult to determine whether a system is a differentiating system or a single system merely by considering whether a distinction is made between the principal perpetrator and the accomplice or between conviction and sentencing. Only the introduction of the perspective of imputation can enable us to see clearly the deep-seated problems caused by the single imputation mode to the illegal connotation of joint crime and reveal the lack of thoroughness in the implementation of the common imputation doctrine by the traditional differentiating system. The Chinese Criminal Law adopts the common imputation mode in the provisions on the principal and the accessory in a joint crime and further distinguishes between the central and marginal characters in common imputation. In this sense, the joint crime system provided for by Chinese Criminal Law is neither a single system nor a traditional differentiating system, but rather a differentiating system in the sense of imputation.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成