法官个体本位抑或法院整体本位——我国法院建构与运行的基本模式选择

顾培东

法官个体本位抑或法院整体本位——我国法院建构与运行的基本模式选择

Judge-oriented Mode or Court-oriented Mode: Mode Selection in the Construction and Operation of Chinese Courts


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:顾培东
    单位:四川大学法学院
    中文关键词:法院改革;法官个体本位;法院整体本位;法官独立
    英文关键词:court reform;the judge-oriented mode;the court-oriented mode;independence of judge
    中文摘要:
    法官个体本位与法院整体本位是法院建构与运行的两种基本模式。我国法院改革在某种程度上呈现出对法官个体本位模式的趋从,但宪法制度安排、法院在政治结构中的地位、司法的社会生态、对法官的激励与约束条件以及综合统筹运用审判资源的要求等,都决定了我国法院建构应当坚持法院整体本位。学术界从技术化层面论证的“法官独立”以及以此为核心的法官个体本位,都经不起实践逻辑的检验。法院改革的方向,不应是从法院整体本位转向法官个体本位,而应是从以院庭长为主导的法院整体本位转向以法官为主导的法院整体本位。当前法院的综合配套改革亦应在这一理念下进行,满足并完善法院整体本位所要求的基本要素。
    英文摘要:
    There are two basic modes of establishment and operation of court system:the judge-oriented mode and the court-oriented mode. To a certain extent, there is a tendency of transition from the court-oriented mode to the judge-oriented mode in the process of the court reform in China. However, this kind of tendency is not compatible with the institutional arrangement of the Constitution, the status of court system in the political structure, the social ecology of the judicature, the existing incentive mechanisms, constraint conditions of judges and the demand to distribute judicial resources in a comprehensive way-all of which require China to adhere to the court-oriented mode of establishment and operation of court system. Academic researches advocating the so-called "independence of the judge", which is encompassed by a judge-oriented mode of court system at the technical level, could not stand the test of logic and practice. The direction of court reform should be a transition not from the court-oriented mode to the judge-oriented mode, but from the court-oriented mode dominated by bureaucrats who bear the identity of judge to the court-oriented mode of court system dominated by judges who perform the actual function of trial. The current comprehensive coordinated reform of the court system should proceed in accordance with this idea and the basic requirements of the court-oriented mode should be satisfied.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成