人工智能与事实认定

栗峥

人工智能与事实认定

Artificial Intelligence and Fact-finding


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:栗峥
    单位:中国政法大学
    中文关键词:artificial intelligence; fact-finding; mind-microstructure; small data
    英文关键词:artificial intelligence; fact-finding; mind-microstructure; small data
    中文摘要:
    人工智能与司法的深度融合,既体现在案件的法律适用环节也体现在事实认定环节,而事实认定是法律适用的前提。人工智能对案件事实认定的介入,需要将证据数据化、对数据进行运算整合、输出人可以理解的结论。在证据数据化环节,需要对证据进行结构化的数据改造,并克服语言障碍。在数据整合环节,人工智能主要以概率推理而不是因果推理作为逻辑推理方式,其算法也需要面对可计算性与复杂性两大难题。在结论输出环节,需要解决机器学习如何深化、信念如何建立与机器如何表达等难题。人工智能融入案件事实认定所面临的这些主要难题,可以尝试通过“小数据”训练,逐步构建人工智能“心智微结构”去慢慢攻克。
    英文摘要:
    The deep integration of artificial intelligence and justice is embodied in both the application of law and fact-finding. The latter is a precondition of the former. To intervene in the fact-finding in a case, artificial intelligence needs to digitize the evidence, integrate the data, and output conclusions that can be understood by human beings. On the step of digitalization of evidence, it is necessary to carry out structured data transformation of evidence and overcome language problems. On the step of data integration, artificial intelligence mainly uses probabilistic reasoning, rather than causal reasoning, as its logical reasoning model and needs to face two major problems of computability and complexity in its algorithm. On the step of conclusion output, it needs to solve the problems of how to deepen machine learning, how to build belief, and how the machine expresses itself. The main problems faced by the integration of artificial intelligence into the fact-finding in cases can be solved through “small data” training and the gradual building of “mind-microstructure” of artificial intelligence.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成