《海牙判决公约》谈判与知识产权的国际司法合作

何其生

《海牙判决公约》谈判与知识产权的国际司法合作

Negotiation of the HCCH Judgment Convention and the InternationalJudicial Cooperation on the Protection of Intellectual Property


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:何其生
    单位:北京大学法学院
    中文关键词:知识产权;《海牙判决公约》;国际司法合作;“中美第一阶段经贸协议”
    英文关键词:intellectual property rights; the HCCH Judgment Convention; international judicial cooperation; Economic and Trade Agreement between the United States of America and the People's Republic of China
    中文摘要:
    在《海牙判决公约》的知识产权问题谈判上,中美欧分别采取了限制性合作、不合作和合作的立场,代表着在多边层面的不同利益博弈模式。一方面,公约排除了对于知识产权的适用,美国的不合作立场成为最终的选择;另一方面,美国通过单边施压和“中美第一阶段经贸协议”拉平了中美知识产权的保护标准,实现了中美在知识产权制度水平与知识产权发展水平上的级差效应,有利于美国的经济收益。而欧盟之所以愿意进行国际合作,也旨在于全球范围内实现知识产权制度水平的“水涨船高”,从而在国际上产生类似于美国的级差效应。中国在知识产权制度水平大幅提升而且知识产权发展水平前景可期的情况下,未来在国际司法合作层面应采取合作模式,以提供国际公共产品,维护自身的知识产权利益。
    英文摘要:
    In the intellectual property rights negotiation of the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters (HCCH Judgment Convention), the European Union (EU), the United States (US) and China have taken the positions of cooperation, non-cooperation and restrictive cooperation respectively, representing different modes of interest game at the multilateral level. The Convention finally excludes its application on intellectual property rights and the US mode of non-cooperation is ultimately adopted. At the same time, through unilateral pressure and the Economic and Trade Agreement between the United States of America and the People's Republic of China, the protection standards of intellectual property rights in China have been improved, and the US has realized comparative advantages over China at the level of intellectual property system and intellectual property development, which is conducive to the US economic benefits. Similarly, the reason why the EU is willing to carry out international cooperation is also for improving the intellectual property system throughout the world, so as to gain global comparative advantages similar to that of the US. In the future, under the circumstance that the intellectual property system has been improved and the prospect of intellectual property development is promising, China should adopt the international cooperation mode at the multilateral level, so as to provide international public products and safeguard its own intellectual property interests.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成