反不正当竞争法架构下的区别性原则

吴峻

反不正当竞争法架构下的区别性原则

Separation Principle under the Regime of the Law against Unfair Competition


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:吴峻
    单位:
    中文关键词:编辑控制;区别性原则;商业信息;编辑处理内容;虚假信息
    英文关键词:editorial control; principle of separation; business communication; editorial content; disinformation
    中文摘要:
    区别性原则经中国广告法确立,但其竞争法属性突出。区别性原则的基础法律逻辑是承认内容提供者对其所发布内容进行编辑控制的自主性和独立性,为此,须在编辑控制与区别性原则之间构建必要的法律联系,基于编辑控制实现编辑处理内容与商业信息的区分。同时,应确认互联网用户自主发表言论时对编辑控制的分享,使得区别性原则可以适用于包括互联网信息服务提供者与互联网用户在内的所有编辑控制主体发布的信息,以实现虚假信息的有效规制。应当借鉴区别性原则的二元规制模式,突破广告法的局限,进一步确立编辑控制对包括广告及商业宣传在内的所有商业信息的识别功能,完善一般性的商业信息识别和标示制度,最终在反不正当竞争法层面实现区别性原则的系统制度构建。
    英文摘要:
    The principle of separation established by Chinese Advertising Law has strong implications for competition law as well. The basic legal logic behind this principle lies in the acknowledgment of autonomous and independent editorial control exercised by content providers over the content offered. A necessary legal connection should therefore be established between editorial control and the principle of separation. Furthermore, editorial content and business communications can be identified and differentiated based on the editorial control concept. Meanwhile, it is also necessary to acknowledge the right of Internet users to take part in editorial control over their own online speeches, so that the principle of separation can be applied to information provided by all entities exercising editorial control, including Internet users and Internet information service providers, and disinformation can be effectively countered in accordance with law. A two-pronged approach should be adopted to the application of the principle of separation. For this purpose, the editorial control concept should be further acknowledged in the identification of any business communication. A general mechanism beyond the range of the Advertising Law should thus be built to effectively identify and label all business communications. By this means, a system for comprehensive application of the principle of separation under the regime of the law against unfair competition can finally be established.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成