数字经济视域下包容审慎监管的法治逻辑

刘权

数字经济视域下包容审慎监管的法治逻辑

The Rule-of-Law Logic of Inclusive and Prudential Regulation from the Perspective of the Digital Economy


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:刘权
    单位:
    中文关键词:包容审慎监管;数字经济;营商环境;容错机制;有为政府
    英文关键词:inclusive and prudential regulation; digital economy; business environment; fault-tolerant mechanism; effective government
    中文摘要:
    传统的监管体系和监管治理手段,已不能适应数字经济的发展要求。包容审慎监管旨在追求效率与安全的动态平衡,其要求政府给予新业态必要的发展时间与试错空间,并根据公共风险的大小进行适时适度干预,是有利于破解传统监管困局的新型监管模式。数字经济的发展规律和特点,为包容审慎监管的实施带来诸多挑战。包容审慎监管的灵活性与能动性,也易引发监管的不确定性问题。为在法治轨道上推进包容审慎监管的理性实施,面对一时看不准发展趋势的新业态,有必要为市场留足发展空间,通过开放决策程序提升行政理性,引入试验机制促成监管的包容审慎,建立容错机制以激励市场与政府探索创新,完善并加强监督机制以确保行政便宜性与最佳性有机统一。
    英文摘要:
    The traditional regulatory system and regulatory governance measures can no longer meet the development requirements of the digital economy. Inclusive and prudential regulation pursues a dynamic balance between efficiency and safety. It requires the government to give new business forms the necessary development time and the necessary space for trial and error. The intervene in a timely and appropriate manner in light of the magnitude of the public risks is required as well. It is a new regulatory model conducive to solving the traditional regulatory dilemma. The development laws and characteristics of the digital economy have brought many challenges to the implementation of inclusive and prudential regulation. The flexibility and dynamism of inclusive and prudential regulation can also easily lead to regulatory uncertainty. China should promote the rational implementation of inclusive and prudential regulation on the track of the rule of law. As to new business forms with unclear development trends, it is necessary to leave enough space for the market to develop, improve administrative rationality through open decision-making procedures, introduce an experimental mechanism to facilitate inclusive and prudent regulation, establish a fault-tolerant mechanism to incentivize the market and to promote government exploration and innovation, and strengthen oversight mechanisms to ensure the organic unity of administrative flexibility and optimality.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成