个人信息权的分析与建构

萧鑫

个人信息权的分析与建构

Analysis and Construction of the Personal Information Right


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:萧鑫
    单位:中国社会科学院法学研究所
    中文关键词:个人信息权;支配权;权利束;个人信息决定权;个人信息权利体系
    英文关键词:personal information right; dominant right; a bundle of rights; right of decision-making on personal information; system of personal information rights
    中文摘要:
    就个人信息上是否有抽象个人信息权的问题,存在分析路径和观点的争论。采取民法传统的权利分析路径,立足解释论自下而上地分析可以发现,我国民法典、个人信息保护法针对个人信息的内容层,实际规定了三类具体权利:决定他人是否有处理权限的利用性权利、他人没有处理权限时的防御性权利和他人有合法权限时的权利。其中,前两项具体权利向上统辖于个人信息保护法第44条规定的个人信息决定权,个人信息决定权就是在利益归属描述上采取排他策略、具有相当追及效力的非典型支配权。个人信息权利体系包括指向个人信息初次分配秩序的个人信息决定权和指向个人信息交换处理秩序的知情权、携带权。
    英文摘要:
    right to personal information, there are debates about the method and the viewpoint of analysis. Taking the traditional approach to rights analysis in civil law and analyzing from the bottom-up viewpoint based on the theory of interpretation, it can be found that the Chinese Civil Code and the Chinese Personal Information Protection Law actually provide for three types of specific rights in the content layer of personal information, that is, exploitation rights, which determine whether others have the authority to process the information, defensive rights when others do not have the authority to process the information, and the rights when others have the authority to process the information. Among them, the first two types of specific rights are derived from the decision-making right of personal information as stipulated in Article 44 of the Personal Information Protection Law, which is an atypical dominant right to personal information that adopts an exclusion strategy in the description of the ownership of interests and has considerable retroactive effects. The system of personal information rights consists of the decision-making right, which focuses on the initial distribution order of personal information, and the right to be informed and the right of portability, which focus on the exchange order of personal information processing.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成