地役权概念的体系性解读
朱广新地役权概念的体系性解读
The Systematic Interpretation of the Conception of Easement
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：朱广新
单位：《中国法学》杂志社
中文关键词：地役权;用益物权;需役地;需役地的利益;为人的地役权
英文关键词：easement;usufructuary right;dominant tenement;interests of dominant tenement;servetudes personae
中文摘要：
自罗马法到近现代一些重要的民法典，地役权概念始终保持了明确的内在规定性。地役权之所以具有如此顽强的超政治体制和跨时空转换生命力，根本原因在于其内在构造的客观性，即其不仅以需役地和供役地的并存为构造基础，而且直接以需役地而非需役地权人的利益为构造目的。如此独特的构造，使地役权拥有了纯技术性概念的外观，在很大程度上掩盖了其“役使他人”的法效果，并进而增强了它的亲和力、便利了它的普适性。这诠释了自罗马法以来的大陆法为何始终强调地役权必须是为了需役地的利益，并决定了地役权不可能具备孵化他种用益物权的“母权”功能。
英文摘要：
The concept of easement(servitutes praediorum) has always maintained a specific intrinsic prescriptive identity from Roman law to some important modern civil codes. The reason why easement has so perseverant vitality that can not only transcend political systems Gut also exceed the time and space is that easement has objective intrinsic structure，that is, easement is not only based on dominant tenement (praedium dominans) and servient tenement but also is to meet the interests of dominant tenewent instead of the interests of subject of right of dominant tenement.This particular structure of ease-ment makes it a pure-technical concept appearance, which conceals the legal effect of making other peo-ple offering service .Furthermore it strengthens its appetency and makes its universal applicability available. All above has explained the cause of the following conclusion:the continental law system has emphasized that easement must he used to satisfy the interests of dominant tenement all the time，and has determined that easement could not have the power to hatch other types of right as a "mother right."
全文阅读： 点击下载
