非物质文化遗产的公共属性

孙昊亮

非物质文化遗产的公共属性

Public Nature of Intangible Culture Heritage


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:孙昊亮
    单位:西北政法大学
    中文关键词:非物质文化遗产;公共属性;私权;产业化
    英文关键词:intangible culture heritage;public nature;private right;industrialization
    中文摘要:
    非物质文化遗产具有文化本位性和公共物品的属性,关系公共利益,公权保护是最适合的保护方式。我国应该尽快立法,明确由政府承担保护非物质文化遗产的主要责任,以公权为基础,主要运用公法手段,在政府的主导下采取各种措施为非物质文化遗产的传承和发展提供平台、创造条件。非物质文化遗产的开发利用与保护是不同性质、不同领域的问题,政府应当引导和规范非物质文化遗产的开发利用和产业化,保证公共利益不被损害。
    英文摘要:
    Intangible culture heritage has the value and function of protecting cultural diversity and increasing group identification. The protection of intangible culture heritage which plays an important role in the development of human society reflects the growing of man’s spiritual and cultural demand after their material life is basically satisfied. There are a lot of problems in the theory and practice of China's intangible cultural heritage protection. In theory, some scholars confuse the intangible cultural heritage with its manifestation and try to realize the protection of intangible cultural heritage through private rights. In practice, some local governments and enterprises industrialize intangible cultural heritage in the name of protecting it, only focusing on its economic benefits and neglecting its cultural character. Such practice has divorced intangible culture heritage from its original cultural environment and made it lose its original substance and essence.Intangible culture heritage, relating to the public interest, is of the nature of culture role and public goods, therefore, to protect it through public authority is the most appropriate mode. Although private rights can protect the manifestations of intangible cultural heritage and may thus protect it indirectly, there are many serious limitations in it. Private rights are to protect private interest, and can not play a fundamental role in protecting public interest. Meanwhile, the market rules can only resolve the problem of interest assignment of intangible cultural heritage and can not resolve the problem of its declination.Therefore, the government, as the representative of public interest, is to assume the responsibility to protect intangible cultural heritage. Relevant laws should be made to stipulate the responsibility of government and adopt various public law measures to support and guide the protection of intangible cultural heritage. The government should provide a platform and create necessary conditions for the protection of it so as to promote its inheritance and innovation. Besides, the government should actively guide and standardize the development, utilization and industrialization of intangible culture heritage and prevent improper utilization of it so as to protect the public interest from being infringed.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成