唐律“夜无故入人家”条源流考

闵冬芳

唐律“夜无故入人家”条源流考

“Intruding an Individual’s Dwelling House without Proper Reason”Item:Its Originand Development in Tang Code


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:闵冬芳
    单位:中国政法大学博士后流动站
    中文关键词:夜无故入人家;正当防卫;唐律;明清律学
    英文关键词:intruding an individual’s dwelling house without any proper reason;legitimate self-defense;the Tang Code;the Ming and Qing Codes
    中文摘要:
    我国古代律典中关于“夜无故入人家”条最早的明文规定始于唐律,但其渊源可追溯至西周。唐律中的“夜无故入人家”条的含义与其渊源条款相比发生了较大的变化。较之唐律,明清律对夜间进入者的处罚加重,而对主人杀死夜间进入者的处罚减轻。清代附在条文下的条例进一步认可了主家以及邻佑等人对夜间入室窃盗之外的其他窃盗行为进行正当防卫的合法性。在《大清新刑律》中,近代正当防卫制度确立,同时侵入住宅的时间也不再区分黑夜与白昼。至此,自唐代以来传统律典中的“夜无故入人家”条被取消。
    英文摘要:
    There was actually no such a general stipulation in regard to legitimate self-defense in ancient Chinese law. However, there were indeed some concrete stipulations concerning legitimate defense against some infringement. One of the most representative items since the Tang Code was the item of “intruding an individual’s dwelling house without any proper reason”.Actually, this item could be traced back to West Zhou. According to the Tang Code, any intruder intruding into an individual’s dwelling house at night, the punishment was 40 blows with light stick. If the host killed the intruder the moment he intruded the dwelling house, the host could be exempt from criminal charge. There are three important variations in this item in the Tang Code compared with the original items. Firstly, the intruding should occur at night. Secondly, the place intruded into was restricted to the dwelling house. Thirdly, the host can only kill the intruder without criminal charge the very moment the intrusion occurred.Compared with the Tang Code, the item specified by the Ming and Qing Codes displayed important differences. Simply put, the punishment of intrusion was getting more severe, and the punishment of the host for injuring or killing the intruder already held was getting less severe. It merits a mention that the Ming Code did not even stipulate the situation of “awareness of non-intentional infringement” as the Tang Code had. In the New Great Qing Penal Code, the legitimate self-defense system was validated formally and the punishment for intruding into an individual’s dwelling house was not specifically restricted to the night any more. Thereafter, the item specified by the Tang Code ceased to exist.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成