论内在的客观处罚条件

周光权

论内在的客观处罚条件

Internal Objective Punishment Condition


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:周光权
    单位:清华大学法学院
    中文关键词:犯罪成立条件;内在的客观处罚条件;非典型的违法要素说;外在的客观处罚条件
    英文关键词:constitutive elements of crime;internal objective punishment condition;atypical element of illegality;external objective punishment condition
    中文摘要:
    在犯罪构成四要件说中,客观处罚条件没有存在余地。但是,在我国刑法立法中,已经出现一些关于客观处罚条件的条文。如何理解和适用这些规定是理论上不可回避的问题。国外的通说认为,所有的客观处罚条件都不要求行为人认识和预见。但是,笼统地看待客观处罚条件,有将复杂问题简单化之嫌。坚持阶层式的犯罪成立要件理论,根据某种条件和违法性的关系密切程度,可以将客观处罚条件分为内在的客观处罚条件和外在的客观处罚条件。承认内在的客观处罚条件概念,客观的超过要素概念就没有必要再提倡。
    英文摘要:
    In the theory of four-element crime constitution, there is no room for the objective punishment condition. But the objective punishable condition already exists in the criminal legislation of our country now. How to understand and apply these provisions is an issue that cannot be avoided in theory. The general view in the foreign countries is that the objective punishable conditions do not require the actor’s cognition and foresight. However, regarding the objective punishable condition in general is suspected of oversimplifying the problem. According to substantial connection between some certain condition and illegality, the objective punishable condition can be divided into the internal and external condition two types, if we insist on the hierarchical constituents of crime theory .The most worthy of discussing is the internal objective punishable condition. It is in the “extended line” of behavior which increases the risk of infringing the interest in law when intervening factors appear. Although it is different from typical illegal element, it can produce illegal effect. Actor just needs to know the possibility of internal objective punishment condition. To the contrary, external objective punishment condition belongs to the category of criminal punishment, has no effect on the illegality and responsibility, and does not require the cognition and foresight of actors.The research of internal objective punishment condition is of great significance to understand and apply some provisions in our criminal legislation. There is necessity for the internal objective punishment condition to exist in the present stage. To put it further, recognizing this concept is in consideration of the doctrines of legally prescribed punishment for special crime and legal interest protection. If we recognize this concept, there is no need to advocate the concept of “objective surpassing elements”. The problems regarded under the name of objective surpassing elements can be analyzed according to the approach of internal objective punishment conditions.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成