人民法院内部审判运行机制的构建

顾培东

人民法院内部审判运行机制的构建

Construction of the Internal Operative Mechanism of Adjudication of the People's Courts


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:顾培东
    单位:四川大学法学院
    中文关键词:法院改革;审判运行机制;审判管理;审判职权配置
    英文关键词:court reform;operative mechanism of adjudication;administration of adjudication;allocation of trial powers
    中文摘要:
    法院如何恰当配置内部各主体、各层级的职权,合理确定各主体、各层级在审判活动中的地位和作用,建立符合审判客观规律和现实条件的审判运行机制,是我国人民法院改革与发展中的重大现实任务。C市人民法院在审判职权的配置与界定、审判流程的建立与控制、审判动态的监督与把控、审判绩效的评价和考核、信息技术的植入和运用等五个方面的探索,正逐步接近其构建“权力关系清晰、主体职责明确、监督制约到位、资源配置优化、审判活动透明、内部流程顺畅、指标导向合理、科技全面支撑”的法院内部审判运行机制之目标。鉴于构建法院审判运行机制在中国特色司法制度微观基础的塑造、我国法院规范化发展、法院改革创新等方面的意义,C市人民法院的实践能为其他司法机构的改革与发展提供有益的启示。
    英文摘要:
    The compound case-decision mode of multi-subject and multi-hierarchy within the People’s court has hindered the collective advantage of the court as the subject of adjudication in the reality of the trial activities. The most important contemporary task with regard to the Chinese court reform is concerned with the achievement of various goals such as the proper allocation of powers to internal subjects and different hierarchies, the appropriate determination of the roles and functions of different subjects and hierarchies in the trial activities, and the establishment of the court adjudicative mechanism corresponding to the objective laws and requirements of adjudication and the present conditions of the courts.Explorations have been made by C Intermediate Court with regard to the allocation of powers, the supervision of the adjudicative process, the supervision and guidance of the dynamic trial activities, the estimation and examination of the trial performance, and the introduction and exploitation of information technology. Such explorations aim at the establishment of the internal operative mechanism with the characteristics of “clear power allocation, determinate roles of different subjects, proper supervision and control, optimal resource allocation, transparent trial proceedings, effective internal process, rationally oriented guidelines and comprehensive technological support”. Due to the significance of the construction of the internal operative mechanism of adjudication to the micro-foundation of the judicial system with Chinese characteristics and the normalization and renovation of the court activities, the explorations and practice of C Intermediate Court may provide beneficial implications in terms of the renovation and development of other judicial organs.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成