从引证看中国刑事诉讼法学研究
左卫民从引证看中国刑事诉讼法学研究
Study on Criminal Procedure Law: from the Point of View of Citation
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：左卫民
单位：四川大学法学院
中文关键词：引证;《法学研究》;刑事诉讼法学
英文关键词：citation;Chinese Journal of Law; criminal procedure law
中文摘要：
学术论文的引证情况能够体现学界的学术交流与争鸣状况。通过对《法学研究》1985—2009年间所有刑事诉讼法学论文引证状况的统计分析发现，其引证数量不断增加，但与社会学、经济学等学科相比依然较低；主要引证法学尤其是刑事诉讼法学文献;对域外文献的引用虽然总量不低，但语种为外语的较少；佐证式引证较多且逐步增加，讨论式引证较少且逐渐减少，运用式引证较少，反对式引证比例较低并不断下降。这些现象表明：我国刑事诉讼法学界的沟通与交流广度有限、实质性与深度不够。未来刑事诉讼法学研究应强化沟通与交流的深度与广度，从而营造更为真实、充分的交流与争鸣氛围，促进学术共同体的形成与刑事诉讼法学的良性发展。
英文摘要：
The academic citation can reflect the situation of academic communication and contention. Through the statistical analysis of the citation situation of all criminal procedure law papers in Chinese Journal of Law from 1985 to 2009, it is found that in the past twenty-five years, the quantity of citation has increased, but compared to sociology and economics, it is still low. At the same time, literature overview shows significant deficiencies in its citation, indicating that the communication in Chinese criminal procedure academia still needs improvement as a whole.Secondly, over ninety percent of the citation in relevant papers is from jurisprudence, among which nearly ninety percent is from criminal procedure law. Although the total amount of references to the literatures from aboard is not low, the references to foreign language literatures are relatively few, and mainly from the developed countries and in English. This indicates that criminal procedure law scholars pay less attention to other disciplines, and their focus on other areas also has significant limitations.Finally, the relevant papers have more evidence-style citation, less discussion-style citation and rare use-style citation, which indicates that scholars only have low-level understanding of others’ research results in most circumstances. They rarely have in-depth understanding of others’ research results and have a dialogue with them, let alone the use of others’ theory. In addition, the proportion of opposition-style citation is relatively low, meanwhile, the quantity of evidence-style citation increases, which indicates the study of criminal procedure law may not be in a good development trend.In the future, the depth and scope of communication should be strengthened to create a more realistic and adequate environment for communication and contention to promote the formation of academic community and the good development of criminal procedure law study.
全文阅读： 点击下载
