深化改革背景下对司法行政化的遏制

龙宗智,袁坚

深化改革背景下对司法行政化的遏制

Curbing the Trend towards the “Administrativization” of Courts against the Background of Deepening the Reform


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:龙宗智,袁坚
    单位:四川大学法学院;四川省高级人民法院
    中文关键词:司法行政化;司法改革;审判规律;去行政化
    英文关键词:administrativization of courts;judicial reform;laws of trial;de-administrativization
    中文摘要:
    司法行政化,即以行政的目的、构造、方法、机理及效果取代司法自身的内容,形成以行政方式操作的司法。法院司法运作的全过程均带有行政化色彩,表现为司法目的和价值的行政化、案件审判活动的行政化、上下级法院关系的行政化、司法人事制度和法院结构的行政化以及审判管理的行政化等。在给定的约束条件下,司法行政化可以弥补一线司法能力之不足,可以抗制外部干预。但其过度发展会妨碍依法治国,损害办案质量与效率,危及司法权威和公信力,阻碍法院工作的可持续发展。司法行政化的根源在于基本权力结构及其运行机制;司法功能设定的非司法化和资源配置的有限性,统一的人事管理制度和财政供应制度以及国家机能分化不足,亦为重要原因。遏制司法行政化需强化法院的司法审查功能、审判功能以及终局性纠纷解决功能;需阻隔行政性要素介入审判,建立审判独立的“二元模式”;需在法院审判管理、司法行政管理、上下级法院业务管理上“去行政化”。
    英文摘要:
    "Administrativization" of courts refers to the replacement of the content of judicial system with administrative goals, structures, approaches, principles and effects, thereby turning it into a judicial system operating in an administrative mode. In recent years, the whole operational process of the court system has gradually taken on an administrative hue, which is manifested in the administrativization of judicial goals and values, of trial method, of the relationship between different levels of courts, of the personnel system and the structure of courts, and of the trial management system. Under certain circumstances, the administrativization of the court system can help courts to make up for their lack of judicial capability and resist outside interventions. However, the excessive development of this trend will impede the rule of law, negatively affect the authority of and public trust in courts, and even hinder the sustainable development of the judicial system. The root cause of the administrativization of the judicial system lies in the basic power structure and operational system of the state. Therefore it is urgent to curb such trend of administrativization in the process of deepening the reform. To achieve this goal, it is necessary to remodel the functions of courts, prevent administrative intervention in trial, strictly adhere to the principle of "letting judges to make their decisions and be responsible for their decisions", eliminate all administrative features in the trial management and personnel management of courts, as well as in the relationship between different levels of courts, and promote the professionalization of judges and the reform of the system of presiding judges.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成