作为规制与治理工具的行政许可

ColinScott

作为规制与治理工具的行政许可

Licensing as a Tool of Regulation and Governance


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:ColinScott
    单位:爱尔兰都柏林大学法学院
    中文关键词:政府规制;行政许可;治理工具;许可替代
    英文关键词:regulation;licensing;tools of governance;alternatives to licensing
    中文摘要:
    源于私人生活中财产权人授权他人分享自己财产权实践的行政许可,正成为一种引人注目的政府规制与治理工具。作为治理工具,行政许可承载了一系列不同的社会目标,规制有时只是其中一个主要目标。当行政许可被限定为规制工具时,可以假定其核心是实现对特定行为的控制,具体机制包括信息收集、准入控制、行为监管以及许可的执行。尽管许可制度具有筛选市场主体并对他们进行识别和规制等积极作用,但同时也存在巨大的负面作用,如限制和阻碍竞争、可能导致权力滥用,而且许可制度是有成本的。政府在采取许可制度过程中,应考虑其他能够达成相同制度目标的替代性工具。
    英文摘要:
    Licensing which originates from more general practices of those with property rights carving out part of their interest to give limited rights to others in respect of their property, is likely to be attractive as a means to assert control. Regulation is conventionally understood as the deployment of governmental authority to establish systematic oversight by reference to rules over some activities valued by society. In the armoury of tools and techniques for regulation, licensing has a central place as the exercise of state control seeking to secure particular social and economic outcomes. However defined, licenses as a tool of government can be deployed for a number of distinct purposes of which regulation is only sometimes the primary purpose. Where licensing is regulatory, we may assume that the key rationale for the regime is to exert control, which can be defined as gathering information, controlling entry, controlling conduct and enforcement. Whilst licensing may have positive effects in terms of capacity to pre-clear market actors and to identify and regulate them, there is significant potential for adverse effects, such as restrictions on entry to the market, abusing of state power and costly. Governments should consider alternative ways of securing the same outcomes prior to introducing licensing regimes. Alternatives to licensing include doing nothing, encouraging self-regulation, using market-like mechanisms to change behaviour and applying regulatory oversight without the burden of licensing.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成