既判力相对性原则:根据、例外与制度化

张卫平

既判力相对性原则:根据、例外与制度化

Principle of the Relativity of Res judicata:J ustification, Exception and Its Institutionalisation


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:张卫平
    单位:清华大学法学院
    中文关键词:既判力;既判力相对性原则;既判力主观范围;第三人撤销之诉
    英文关键词:res judicata;principle of the relativity of res judicata;subjective scope of res judicata;third-party opposition
    中文摘要:
    既判力相对性原则是既判力制度中的一项基本原则,是指判决的既判力在一般情形下仅发生于当事人之间.这一原则不仅有助于纠纷的终局解决,保障法律关系的稳定,同时能够为没有参加诉讼的案外第三人的民事权益提供程序保障.作为既判力相对性原则的例外,确定判决对于诉讼系属后的承继人及为当事人或其承继人占有请求之标的物者,亦有效力.为他人之利益而作为原告或被告者之确定判决,对于该他人也有效力.我国现行民事诉讼法尚未明确规定既判力相对性原则.这一原则的缺失导致了民事诉讼法在第三人权益的程序保障方面存有重大缺陷,也造成了实践中第三人撤销之诉适用的混乱局面.应当完善既判力制度,确立既判力相对性原则,将第三人撤销之诉的适用限制在确定判决既判力相对性的例外情形.
    英文摘要:
    The principle of the relativity of res judicata, as a fundamental principle of res judicata system, means that, under normal circumstances, res judicata occurs only between the parties. This principle not only is conductive to reaching final solutions to disputes and guarding the stability of legal relationship, but also provides procedural safeguards for the rights and interests of a third person who does not participate in the litigation. As an exception to the principle of the relativity of res judicata, a final judgment has legal effect also on a successor after action dependence and on a person who is in possession of the requested subject matter on behalf of a party or the heirs of that party. A final judgment on a case in which a person becomes the plaintiff or defendant on behalf of another person has legal effect also on that another person. The current Chinese Civil Procedure Law contains no clear stipulation on the principle of the relativity of res judicata, which has not only led to a major flaw in the procedure for the protection of the rights and interests of a third person, but also caused confusions in the application of third-party opposition in practice. China should improve the system of res judicata, establish the principle of the relativity of res judicata, and limit the application of third-party opposition to circumstances that constitute exceptions to the principle of the relativity of res judicata.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成