诱惑侦查的程序控制

程雷

诱惑侦查的程序控制

Procedural Control of Entrapment


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:程雷
    单位:中国人民大学刑事法律科学研究中心
    中文关键词:诱惑侦查;特情引诱;隐匿身份侦查;合法性判断标准
    英文关键词:entrapment;inducement by informer;undercover investigation;criterion of legality
    中文摘要:
    为应对日益严峻的隐形化犯罪的挑战,在过去二三十年间的侦查实践中,诱惑侦查得到了更多的应用.尽管2012年修改刑事诉讼法过程中,通过新增第151条的规定试图提升此类侦查手段的法治化程度,但由于法律规定的宽泛与模糊、司法处断原则的失当与片面,诱惑侦查适用过程中凸显出执法无序与司法失范的弊端.解决问题的出路是,在法律解释论层面,应当对合法性判断标准、适用对象、程序控制机制与违法制裁后果予以明确;在司法裁断方面,应当跳出"犯意引诱"与"机会提供"二分法的窠臼,基于我国特有的侦查权规制现状,采用控权最为严格的分离式混合模式,即无论是违反诱发他人产生犯意的主观标准,还是僭越客观标准,即侦查人员使用了过度且令普通人难以抵御的诱惑手法,均属违法.
    英文摘要:
    To meet the challenges posed by increasingly serious invisible crimes, entrapment has been used more and more frequently by many countries in the past twenty to thirty years. China is of no exception in this respect, especially in the investigation of drug-related crimes. No law had existed in China to regulate police power of entrapment until in 2012 when China revised its Criminal Procedure Law. Although, in the revision of the Criminal Procedure Law in 2012, a new Article 151 was added to the Law in an attempt to increase the rule-of-law level of such investigatory methods, the article itself is too broad and vague and the principle of judicial judgment on entrapment is improper and one-sided. As a result, prominent problems of disorder in law enforcement and anomie in judicial control have emerged in the process of application of entrapment. To solve these problems, China should clarify through the interpretation of law the criterion on legality, the objects of application, the procedural control mechanism, and the consequences of the violation of law relating to entrapment. In the determination of the legality of entrapment, the court should abandon the traditional dichotomy between "incitation of criminal intention" and "provision of crime opportunity", but instead adopt a discrete hybrid approach, by which any use of excessive inducement that is hard to resist by ordinary people in criminal investigation is illegal, whether it fails the subjective or objective test of legality.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成