国际法院解释领土条约的路径、方法及其拓展

张卫彬

国际法院解释领土条约的路径、方法及其拓展

ICJ's Practice on Treaty Interpretation in Cases of Territorial Disputes


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:张卫彬
    单位:
    中文关键词:条约;领土条约;条约解释;国际法院
    英文关键词:treaty;territorial treaty;treaty interpretation;the International Court of Justice
    中文摘要:
    领土主权属于一国的根本问题.由于部分领土条约相关条款过于原则或模糊不清,当事方会产生条约解释上的国际争端.通常,国际法院依据《维也纳条约法公约》第31、32条规定的解释规则进行阐释.但是,领土条约具有与一般条约不同的特性,这一特性也决定了其解释方法的特殊性.条约解释与争议领土主权的归属存在密切关系,不当解释会严重损害当事国的领土主权.正是出于此顾虑,国际法院过于严格遵照条约文本语言表述的精确性,但在司法实践中又出现一定的矛盾与反复,甚至在个案中弱化条约解释的价值,转而以有效统治作为判案的法理依据.国际法院的做法动摇了国际社会相关当事方将领土争端提交国际法院,采取法律方式解决纠纷的信心,值得关注和深入研究.
    英文摘要:
    Territorial sovereignty is the fundamental issue for a state. However, some territorial treaties are too general and ambiguous to settle the territorial border between two states and therefore are likely to lead to international disputes over treaty interpretation. Usually, the International Court of Justice (the Court) explains relevant articles of a treaty according to Articles 31-32 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. Considering the utmost importance of a territorial treaty, the Court always strictly follows the precise language of the treaty. However, there are contradictions and inconsistencies in Court's judicial practices. Moreover, the Court has also made judgment based on the doctrine of effective control, which weaken the value of treaty interpretation. Therefore, the Court should define rules of interpretation that can be anticipated by parties during the trial. Especially, if the Court can solve territorial disputes through treaty interpretation, it should not weaken the value of treaty interpretation by relying on the principle of effective control. Meanwhile, the Court should not be too dependent on the principle of stable boundary, but should set certain restrictions on it. Otherwise, it may deviate from the normal process of territorial treaty interpretation, and put cart before the horse. Thirdly, based on evidentiary rules of admissibility, subsequent practice used to interpret the territorial treaty must be related to the treaty and occured before the critical date if such date can be determined. The Court's practices on treaty interpretation in cases of territorial disputes are worth noting and studying.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成