民法典总则编“法律行为”一章学者建议稿的编写说明

孙宪忠

民法典总则编“法律行为”一章学者建议稿的编写说明

Explanations on the Scholars' Draft of the Chapter on “Legal Act” in the General Principles of the Chinese Civil Code


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:孙宪忠
    单位:中国社会科学院法学所
    中文关键词:民法典;民法总则;法律行为;意思自治;负担行为;处分行为
    英文关键词:Civil Code;General Principles of Civil Law;legal act;autonomy of will;act of debt;act of disposition
    中文摘要:
    民法典总则编之中,法律行为制度的设计,不论是体系结构还是具体条文的编写,都对民法整体功能具有核心价值.法律行为得以建立的法思想渊源,是人文主义革命以来得以确立的民事主体对于自己权利义务甚至法律责任的选择权和决定权.按照这种法思想确立的意思自治原则,在确定法律行为整体结构和具体制度上发挥决定性作用.我国现有立法在法律行为理论的接受方面的主要不足,恰恰在于未能全面地接受法律行为制度的法思想基础,因而在现行立法的制度体系和条文设计中未能全面贯彻法律行为理论.现行立法在行为主体的类型划分方面存在不足.现行立法在贯彻作为民法基本权利类型的支配权和请求权的划分方面,只承认请求权的法律行为根据,而不承认支配权的法律行为根据,在关于现代人事关系、人身关系方面,未能接受法律行为作为根据.这些缺陷应当在编纂民法典总则编时予以弥补.
    英文摘要:
    The design of the institution of legal act in the title on General Principles of the Chinese Civil Code, whether in terms of institutional structure or in terms of the formulation of concrete provisions, is of absolute core value to the macro-function of the Chinese civil law. The concept of legal act is based on the legal thinking about the right of civil subjects to choose and decide their own rights, obligations, even legal responsibilities, established since the Humanism Movements. The principle of the autonomy of will, established according to this legal thinking, plays a decisive role in the determination of the overall structure and the concrete institution of legal act. The main deficiency in the current Chinese legal theory with respect to the acceptance of the theory of legal act lies exactly in its failure to accept in a thorough and complete way the ideological basis of the institution of legal act, which leads to the failure of the current legislation to embody in a thorough and complete way the theory of legal act in the design of the overall system and concrete legal provisions. For example, the current Chinese legislation recognizes only the legal-act basis of the right of claim, but not that of the right of control, in the division between the right of control and the right of claim, which are the basic rights in civil law, and it fails to accept the legal-act basis of modern personal relations. The article puts forward suggestions on the construction of the institution of legal act in the General Principles of the Chinese Civil Code with a view to remedying the defects in the current legislation.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成