基于法官集体经验的量刑预测研究

白建军

基于法官集体经验的量刑预测研究

Sentencing Prediction Research Based on Judges' Collective Experience


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:白建军
    单位:北京大学法学院
    中文关键词:多情节组合;量刑确定性;量刑模型;量刑预测
    英文关键词:multi-circumstance combination;determinacy of sentencing;sentencing model;prediction of sentencing
    中文摘要:
    各种法定量刑情节在具体个案中有各种可能的组合,但对于多情节案件如何量刑却无明确的法律规定,导致此类案件的量刑结果不确定。以十四万余交通肇事罪案件为样本,对其量刑进行确定性检验发现:通过限缩量刑情节的裁量幅度,可以将此类案件的量刑确定性由原来的30.5%提高到51.1%;在此基础上控制样本离散性程度,可以将量刑确定性由51.1%进一步提高到73.4%。据此建立的量刑模型可用于量刑预测,促进司法公正,提高审判管理水平。归纳法官的集体经验用以指导量刑实践,是提高量刑确定性的有效方法。
    英文摘要:
    The fact that there are numerous possible combinations of various kinds of legal sentencing circumstances in one specific case, but no clear regulation on sentencing in multi-circumstance cases has led to the uncertainty of sentencing in these cases. This author takes 140,000 traffic accident cases as sample and carries out deterministic test on them. The results show that the degree of determinacy of sentencing can be increased from 30.5% to 51.1% by controlling the scope of legal sentencing circumstances. On the basis of controlling the scope, the degree of determinacy can be further increased from 51.1% to 73.4% by controlling the degree of sample discretization. This sentencing model can be used to predict the sentencing of individual cases, and to push forward the realization of judicial justice. In this process, judges are not the objects to be pushed, but the main body of collective experience that promote judicial justice by complementing and learning from each other. This sentencing model can also provide a new means and basis for the superior court or the parties concerned to carry out legal supervision over the sentencing quality of courts at all levels. This study shows that the use of judges' collective experience to guide sentencing is the basic guarantee for improving the determinacy of sentencing. Paying close attention to judges' collective experience means using experience to calibrate experience, using discretion to regulate discretion, and using independent trial to restrict independent trial.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成