认罪认罚何以从宽:误区与正解——反思效率优先的改革主张
左卫民认罪认罚何以从宽:误区与正解——反思效率优先的改革主张
Why Lenient Treatment for Admission of Guilt and Acceptance of Punishment
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：左卫民
单位：国家2011协同创新计划"司法文明协同创新中心";四川大学法学院
中文关键词：认罪认罚从宽;司法改革;辩诉交易
英文关键词：lenient treatment for admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment;judicial reform;plea bargaining
中文摘要：
完善认罪认罚从宽制度是当下司法改革的重要议题之一。有关这一制度如何在实践中落地，目前存在着将提高诉讼效率作为改革的主要目的，应在参考美国辩诉交易制度的基础上，构建认罪认罚后从快处理的刑事程序等认识误区。这些认识误区源于论者对我国刑事司法实践所面临的问题的本质，和对美国辩诉交易制度的产生背景及制约因素的误读。认罪认罚从宽制度改革应致力于解决被追诉人认罪认罚却得不到适当、有效从宽处理的实践难题，因此，这一改革应主要从实体法层面着手，明确认罪认罚后从宽处理的具体规则；在程序法方面则应完善认罪认罚从宽案件审理的程序构造，更好地保障实体从宽的实现；相应地，要防止相关改革设计与相关举措过度追求效率。
英文摘要：
Improving the system of lenient treatment for admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment has become one of the important tasks in the current judicial reform in China that has led to heated debate in academia. Some local judicial authorities have already launched pilot programs under the authorization of central authorities. However, there are some misconceptions with respect to the question of how to implement the system in practice, such as taking the improvement of the efficiency of litigation as the main purpose and constructing a fast criminal process for defendants who admit guilt and accept punishment by drawing on the plea bargaining system of the United States. Such viewpoints are rooted in the misunderstandings of the nature of the problems in China's criminal judicial practice and of the background and constraints of the plea bargaining system of the United States. The correct way of reforming the system of lenient treatment for admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment should be constructing concrete rules on "lenient" treatment after the defendant's "admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment" at the substantive level, so as to solve the practical problem that the defendant cannot get appropriate and effective lenient treatment after admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment. At the procedural level, China should improve the relevant trial procedure, so as to better realize substantive lenient treatment. Corresponding, it is necessary to avoid the reform design and related measures that excessively pursue efficiency.
全文阅读： 点击下载
