清律“家人共盗”的法思想源流
谢晶清律“家人共盗”的法思想源流
Legal Thought of “Household Joint Theft” in the Qing Code
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：谢晶
单位：中国政法大学法学院
中文关键词：大清律例;共同犯罪;一家人共犯罪;共盗;礼教
英文关键词：The Qing Code;joint crime;household joint crime;joint theft;Confucian ethical code
中文摘要：
在儒家的治国平天下理想及方案中，教化是其重要部分。以《大清律例》为代表的传统律典因深受儒家之影响，也将这一理念容纳进来，并在有关“家人共盗”问题的律例中集中展现，在赋予尊长对卑幼的专制之权时，亦给他们附加教化之责——“养不教，父之过”的“连坐”责任。在儒家看来，推行教化的理想方式是礼乐（而非刑政）。礼乐源自人心、顺应人性，能在较大程度上发挥预防犯罪、维护社会秩序的效用。历代王朝在将这一理念转化为法律制度并运用于实践之中时，片面强调百姓中家长的责任，忽略“为民父母”的统治者所应同样负有的（甚至更大的）责任，在一定程度上反映出君主推诿自身责任的心理。
英文摘要：
Ethical enlightenment is very important in Confucian ideal scheme of governing the country and pacifying the world. Because traditional Chinese laws, represented by the Qing Code, were deeply influenced by Confucianism, they accepted this idea and put it into the rule of household joint crime, which gave powers to the elders in family while imposing responsibilities on them. In Confucianism, the best method of enlightenment is "Li" and "Yue" (rather than punishment and politics). "Li" and "Yue" come from the people's hearts and conform to human nature, so they are conducive to preventing crimes and maintaining social order. When the rulers of various dynasties practiced this idea, they focused on the responsibilities of the elders in family while ignoring of their own greater responsibilities as the parents of their people, which reflected the rulers' selfish mentality.
全文阅读： 点击下载
