一致性解释原则在国际贸易行政案件中的适用

一致性解释原则在国际贸易行政案件中的适用

Application of the Principle of Consistent Interpretation in International Trade Administrative Cases

    期刊名称：《法学研究》
    期刊年份：
    作者：彭岳
    单位：南京大学法学院
    中文关键词：国际贸易行政案件;一致性解释原则;司法遵从原则;解释权限
    英文关键词：international trade administrative cases;the principle of consistent interpretation;the principle of judicial compliance;interpretative power
    中文摘要：
    最高人民法院《关于审理国际贸易行政案件若干问题的规定》第9条规定了一致性解释原则，意图通过司法审查的方式促使行政行为符合国际条约特别是WTO协定的相关规定。出于国际主义政策考量，该原则要求国内法院承担职责，积极整合国内法与国际法体系。司法实践表明，在条约适用、解释和履行制度尚不成熟的国内法语境下，中国法院通常回避适用一致性解释原则。即使在适用该原则的案件中，相关判决也因缺乏方法论意识而难有启示意义。究其原因，第9条项下的一致性解释原则片面强调国际主义理据，忽视了国内法体系中解释权限的分配现状。为切实发挥该原则的体系整合功能，实现国内法与国际法体系的良性互动，应将一致性解释原则嵌入司法遵从原则之中。
    英文摘要：
    Article 9 of Provisions of the Supreme People's Court on Several Issues Concerning the Hearing of International Trade Administrative Cases provide for the principle of consistent interpretation with a view to ensuring through judicial review that administrative bodies in China act in accordance with relevant provisions of international treaties, especially WTO agreements. Based on internationalist policy considerations, this principle requires domestic courts to assume their responsibility of actively integrating domestic and international legal systems. Judicial practice shows that Chinese courts usually avoid applying the principle of consistent interpretation in domestic legal context, where the practice of application, interpretation and performance of treaty are not yet mature. Even in cases where this principle is applied, the relevant judgments are hardly enlightening for lack of methodological awareness. The reason for this is that the principle of consistent interpretation under Article 9 one-sidedly emphasizes the rationale of internationalism and ignores the status quo of the allocation of interpretative power in domestic legal system. The principle of consistent interpretation should be embedded into the principle of judicial compliance, so as to give full play to its function of system integration and realize positive interaction between domestic and international legal systems.
    全文阅读：  点击下载