人工智能时代的法律议论

季卫东

人工智能时代的法律议论

Legal Argumentation in the Era of Artificial Intelligence


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:季卫东
    单位:上海交通大学法学院
    中文关键词:人工智能;逻辑法学;法律议论;智慧司法;法律论题学
    英文关键词:artificial intelligence, logic jurisprudence, legal argumentation, smart justice, catalogue of legal topics
    中文摘要:
    人工智能作为一种重要的技术手段,能够辅助法律议论,确保法律论证、推理、判断以及决定的客观性和中立性。但是,司法人工智能在提高同案同判水平和审判可预测性的同时,也容易导致法律议论流于形式,助长算法歧视。人工智能的深度学习离不开法律专家的介入和监督,智慧司法的系统构建应为法律解释和法律议论预留空间。为使人工智能真正有效地模拟法律议论,法律人需对法律背景知识体系进行梳理和电脑化处理,从一般条款、元规则入手,以法律论题学为媒介,建立价值标准体系。为实现价值判断的客观化,除为法律推理的价值体系建立论题目录、缔结关于法律议论的通信协议外,确立价值函数和价值权重也是一项重要任务。此外,还应开拓与人工智能相兼容的法律议论方式,将具体的场景和语境纳入法律议论电脑化的视野,开发相应的技术方法和模型。
    英文摘要:
    As an important technical means, AI can assist legal argumentation and ensure the objectivity and neutrality of legal argumentation, reasoning, judgment and decision. In helping to improve the accuracy of “treating like cases alike”, as well as the predictability of the trial process, judicial AI may in a similar way lead to the result of legal argumentation being hollowed out and becoming no more than mere formality, as well as fostering algorithmic discrimination. For this very reason, the deep learning of AI is inseparable from the intervention and supervision of legal experts. The system construction of intelligent justice should reserve space for legal interpretation and legal discussion. To make artificial intelligence simulate the real law effectively, lawyers should sort out legal background knowledge and enable the computerized process by virtue of general rules and meta rules, by means of the catalogue of topics, and finally establish a value standard system. In order to achieve the objective of value judgment, in addition to build the value system of legal reasoning topic directory to conclude about the law of communication protocols, establishing the value function and the value of the weight is also an important task. Furthermore, there is a need to develop the methods of legal argumentation that are compatible with AI technique, bring the specific scenarios and context into the visual field of the computerization of legal argumentation, and develop corresponding technical methods and models.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成