刑民交叉实体问题的解决路径——“法律效果论”之展开
陈少青刑民交叉实体问题的解决路径——“法律效果论”之展开
Solutions to the Intersection of Criminal Law and Civil Law Substantive Problems
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：陈少青
单位：对外经济贸易大学法学院
中文关键词：刑民交叉;违法论;法律效果论;法秩序统一性
英文关键词：intersection of criminal law and civil law; the illegality theory; the legal effect theory; unity of legal order
中文摘要：
刑民交叉实体问题的最终落脚点是，刑民规范的适用是否相互影响以及在何种范围内相互影响。或者因为民事违法概念的体系定位与适用缺陷，或者因为会导致法秩序统一性原则的形骸化，处理刑民交叉实体问题的“违法论”路径欠缺合理性。刑民交叉的连接点不是违法性，真正的连接点是法律效果；以评价对象为主线，刑民交叉实体问题的解决路径应从“违法论”转向“法律效果论”。只有当刑法和民法评价的法律事实具有同一性时，二者的法律效果才可能无法兼容。此时，若刑民规范目的整体一致，对法律主体的惩戒或保护方向相同，则只需对刑民法律效果进行综合考量；若刑民规范目的明显对立，对法律主体的惩戒或保护方向相反，则需要在案件事实层面进行拆分，为刑民规范适用划定不同的案件类型，从刑民交叉回归刑民分立。
英文摘要：
The roots of the intersection of criminal law and civil law substantive problems are the questions of whether the application of norms of criminal law and those of civil law affects each other and to what extent they affect each other. The systematic orientation and applicative defects of the concept of civil offense, together with the loss of substance of the principle of unity of legal order at the illegality level, leads to the lack of rationality of “the illegality theory”. The real intersecting point of criminal law and civil law is not illegality, but the legal effect. This paper takes the evaluation object as the main line, and shifts the approach to the problems from “the illegality theory” to “the legal effect theory”. The risk of incompatible legal effect can emerge only when legal facts evaluated by criminal law and those evaluated by civil law are identical. In such cases, if the normative purposes of criminal law and civil law are consistent, that is to say, when the sanction or protection of the legal subject under criminal law and that under civil law are in the same direction, a comprehensive consideration of the legal effects of criminal law and civil law would be sufficient. Conversely, if the normative purposes of criminal law and those of civil law are clearly opposed to each other, that is to say, when the sanction or protection of the legal subject under criminal law and that under civil law are in opposite directions, the application of criminal law and that of civil law need to be separated at the level of facts of the case, so as to define different types of cases for the normative application of criminal law and civil law. Under this situation, the relationship between criminal law and civil law changes from intersection back to separation.
全文阅读： 点击下载
