被追诉人认罪认罚的撤回
汪海燕被追诉人认罪认罚的撤回
Withdrawal of the Plea of Guilty and Acceptance of Punishment by the Accused
期刊名称:《法学研究》
期刊年份:
作者:汪海燕
单位:中国政法大学刑事司法学院、“2011计划”司法文明协同创新中心
中文关键词:认罪认罚;撤回;上诉不加刑
英文关键词:pleading guilty and accepting punishment; withdrawal; no additional punishment for appeal
中文摘要:
认罪认罚从宽具结内含协商与合意的因素,但其权利品性不应被忽视。允许被追诉人撤回认罪认罚是保障认罪认罚自愿性的内在要求,符合无罪推定之精神,契合诉讼运行规律,也是有效防范相关制度风险的需要。撤回认罪认罚的对象,可以分为撤回认事、认罪、认罪名和认罚等不同层次;撤回理由包括有因撤回和无因撤回。被追诉人行使认罪认罚撤回权之后,具结书的认罪内容不应再作为被追诉人有罪供述的证据使用,也不能因撤回认罪认罚而作出对被追诉人不利的推定;撤回的效果是“恢复原状”,但撤回认罪认罚对强制措施的适用、不起诉决定、审理程序和量刑等均可能产生影响。当前语境下,不应剥夺认罪认罚案件被告人的上诉权,也不应以各种方式限制“上诉不加刑”原则的适用。
英文摘要:
The affidavit of pleading guilty and accepting punishment with leniency contains the element of negotiation and consensus, but its character of right should not be ignored. Permitting the accused to withdraw the plea of guilty and acceptance of punishment is an inherent requirement of voluntariness guarantee. As such, it conforms to the spirit of presumption of innocence and the rules of procedure operation and satisfies the need of effectively controlling the risks in relevant systems. The objects of withdrawal of plea of guilty and acceptance of punishment can be divided into fact, crime, accusation, measurement of penalty and so on and the reasons of withdrawal include withdrawal with cause and withdrawal without cause. When the accused exercises the right of withdrawal, the content of the plea of guilty in affidavit should not be the evidence of guilt, and the negative presumption on the basis of withdrawal should not be made. The effect of withdrawal is “restoration of the original condition or state”. However, the withdrawal may have an impact on the application of compulsory measure, the non-prosecution decision, the trial procedure, the sentencing, and so on. In the current context, the right of the accused to appeal should not be deprived, and the application of the principle of no additional punishment for appeal should not be limited in any way in cases of pleading guilty and accepting punishment.
全文阅读: 点击下载