功能主义视域下的行政协议
徐键功能主义视域下的行政协议
Administrative Agreement from the Perspective of Functionalism
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：徐键
单位：上海财经大学法学院
中文关键词：行政协议;行政私法行为;高权行政;合作行政
英文关键词：administrative agreement; administrative private act; public power administration; cooperative administration
中文摘要：
行为要素思路是当前识别行政协议的主流思路，其以合意行为是否具备特定的公法要素为聚焦点，忽视了对行政协议的目的功能及应用场域的关照，使得行政协议与行政私法行为的区分变得困难。行政协议是针对高权行政领域等级化之行为模式及组织机制的反思性产物，对行政协议的识别不应跳出高权行政的范围。面对高权行政中传统行政模式的弹性不足问题，行政协议通过行为机制的革新强化相对人的意愿交流能力；通过组织机制的改造来回应任务执行的合作需求。基于功能目的上的差异，行政协议可以类型化为程序介入型协议和公务转移型协议。以类型化为基础，运用不同的规则和方法，可以便利行政协议的识别。
英文摘要：
The behavioral element thinking is currently the mainstream thinking in the identification of administrative agreements. Since this thinking focuses on whether an agreement contains specific public law elements, it often ignores the purpose and function, as well as the limitation of the application scope of administrative agreement, thus it's difficult to distinguish between administrative agreements and administrative private acts. Administrative agreement is a product of reflections on the traditional hierarchical behavior mode and organizational mechanism in the field of public power administration. The identification of administrative agreements should therefore not go beyond the scope of public power administration. Faced with the lack of flexibility in traditional modes of public power administration, administrative agreement improves the ability of administrative counterparts to communicate their intent through the innovation of the behavior mechanism and responds to the need for cooperation in performing administrative tasks through the reform of the organizational mechanism. Based on the differences in purpose and function, administrative agreements can be divided into procedural agreements and agreements for transferring administrative tasks. In order to identify administrative agreements more effectively, different identification rules and methods should be applied on bases of these two different types of administrative agreements.
全文阅读： 点击下载
