论刑事综合型证明模式及其对印证模式的超越
向燕论刑事综合型证明模式及其对印证模式的超越
Comprehensive Mode of Criminal Proof and Its Transcendence overthe Corroboration Mode
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：向燕
单位：西南政法大学
中文关键词：印证;综合型证明模式;自然生活历程事实;补助证据
英文关键词：corroboration mode of proof; comprehensive mode of proof; natural historical fact; subsidiary evidences
中文摘要：
目前学界对印证证明模式的研究多停留于经验现象层面，忽视了证明模式要解决的终极问题，即如何通过证据发现真实，司法证明的核心要素和作用机理究竟是什么。我国以印证证明模式为代表的传统证明理论和实践，对司法推理活动的关注和分析不足，普遍忽视司法证明中“叙事”和“法则”的作用，倚重核心证据而轻视补助证据，侧重单向的线性推论而忽视事实推理的论证结构，导致印证证明模式在发现真实方面存在局限。依据司法推理的一般原理，确立一种以“自然生活历程事实”为证明对象，融合核心证据与补助证据，容许或然性推论的综合型证明模式，是实现刑事诉讼发现真实目的的根本路径。
英文摘要：
Currently the researches on the corroboration mode of proof in China mostly focus on the level of empirical phenomenon, while ignoring the ultimate questions of proof mode, namely how to find the truth through evidences and what the core elements of and functional mechanism for judicial proof are. The corroboration mode of proof, as the representative of the traditional judicial proof theories and practices in China, neglects the analysis of judicial reasoning and the function of “narratives” and “generalizations”. It relies on core evidences and underestimates subsidiary evidences, focuses on the one-way linear inference and ignores the argument structure, thus leading to its limitation in finding the truth. According to the general principle of the judicial proof, the fundamental way to realize the fact-finding purpose of criminal procedure law is to establish a comprehensive proof mode that takes the natural historical fact as its object of proof, integrates core evidences and subsidiary evidences and allows for probabilistic inferences.
全文阅读： 点击下载
