全球知识产权治理博弈的深层话语构造：中国范式和中国路径
邵科全球知识产权治理博弈的深层话语构造：中国范式和中国路径
Deep Dialectical Structure of Global Intellectual Property Governance Game: Chinese Paradigm and Chinese Approach
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：邵科
单位：
中文关键词：全球知识产权治理;知识公域;理念框定;中国范式;中国路径
英文关键词：global intellectual property governance; knowledge commons; framing idea; Chinese paradigm; Chinese approach
中文摘要：
全球知识产权治理不是比较法或私法视角能够完整洞照的领域，而是社会学及国际关系学视角下理念、框定、行动论的真切投影。唯有从细节上呈现全球知识产权治理冲突、变革、造法的内在原理，方能开辟中国方案平视西方、会通而超胜的建构式超越之路。肇建以中国文化之深层话语构造为本源的、直指全球知识产权治理变革根本困境的中国范式和中国路径，能够推动国际法律规范的重构。它符合世界文化多样性的普遍诉求，也是对海外知识产权主流学派期待“新路径”、消解西方“一元轴心”的充分回应。在当前大国竞争的形势下，它可以成为包容产业创新与世界均衡发展的最大公约数，从而进一步颠覆美国全球知识霸权的“合法性”，并取得“义利兼顾、万物并育”之至诚公理在世界范围内的深层共鸣。
英文摘要：
Global intellectual property governance is an area that comparative law and private law studies are unable to thoroughly illuminate. It is not only a battlefield of contesting economic powers, but also an acute reflection of ideas, framing and their mobilization observed from the perspective of sociology and international relations. China can contribute to global intellectual property governance in a non-Western, dialectical and constructive way only by unfolding scrupulously the inherent mechanism of conflicts, reforms and lawmaking in the current governance domain. This article offers a rigorous and detailed discussion on the methodologies, dialectical structures and examples of the abovementioned mechanism, followed by a proposal of paradigms and approaches for China to find a way out of the fundamental dialectical predicaments faced by global intellectual property governance through the establishment of its own body of knowledge. Such an approach to improve the deep dialectical structure of global governance through Chinese culture can help to reshape international legal norms. It responds to the universal appeal for cultural diversity as well as the expectation of overseas mainstream schools of intellectual property for "new approaches" to contract the Western "unitary axis". In the current global context, it may become the greatest common divisor for industrial innovation and balanced global development that can invalidate the "legitimacy" of US global knowledge hegemony and create an international resonance on sincere and impartial justifications for righteousness, proper interests and coexistence of all.
全文阅读： 点击下载
