论区块链证据
刘品新论区块链证据
On Blockchain Evidence
期刊名称:《法学研究》
期刊年份:
作者:刘品新
单位:
中文关键词:区块链证据;电子证据;证据规则
英文关键词:blockchain evidence; electronic evidence; rules of evidence
中文摘要:
区块链证据泛指基于区块链技术的一切证明材料,可以具体化为区块链生成、存储与核验之证据。得益于高新技术的加持,区块链证据在厘清涉众复杂案件事实、运用海量异构证据办案与提升智慧司法探索水平等方面独具价值。法律及规范对该新生事物应采取理性态度,遵循同等性对待与差别性归位的原则,并聚焦于真实性问题进行规则适配。缘于哈希校验、时间锁定与节点印证等技术特点,区块链证据在真实性方面得到极大增强,呈现出入链后数据真实性有保障、入链前数据真实性可优化两大定律。我国应以此两定律为技术基础,以既有电子证据真实性规则为制度基础,检讨2021年最高人民法院《人民法院在线诉讼规则》新设条文的不足,挖掘域外探索中可资借鉴的经验,从而构建对区块链证据真实性予以推定、司法认知的规则。
英文摘要:
Blockchain evidence refers to all evidentiary materials based on blockchain technology, which can be divided into blockchain-generated evidence, blockchain-stored evidence and blockchain-verified evidence. Based on this cutting-edge technology, blockchain evidence has unique values in clarifying the facts of complex cases, analyzing large amounts of heterogeneous digital evidence and promoting the development of intelligent judicial system. In adopting related legal rules, China should adopt a rational attitude towards the blockchain evidence, adhere to the principles of non-discriminatory treatment and deferential classification, and focus on the issue of authenticity. Technological characteristics such as hash verification, time locking and node verification have greatly enhanced the veracity of blockchain evidence, which can not only guarantee the verification of data after entering the chain, but also optimize the verification of the data before entering the chain. Based on the above two advantages and the existing authenticity rules of electronic evidence, China should review the legislative defects in the Rules of Online Litigation of People's Courts, explore and draw on comparative experiences, and make rules on the judicial cognition and presumption of the veracity of blockchain evidence.
全文阅读: 点击下载