作为规范的技术标准及其与法律的关系

陈伟

作为规范的技术标准及其与法律的关系

Technical Standards as Norms and Their Relationship with Law


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:陈伟
    单位:
    中文关键词:技术标准|合理定型|强制性标准|合规抗辩|环境标准
    英文关键词:technical standard|reasonable shaping|mandatory standard|defense of regulatory compliance|environmental standard
    中文摘要:
    标准化过程是科学技术与价值判断相融合的合理化过程。技术标准是对生产过程、产品或环境质量之合理定型的规范系统,是量化指标最集中、与法律互动最频繁的标准之一。技术标准并非公法规范,无论对于公法还是私法,技术标准的功能都是提供合理定型的一种参照规定。强制性标准的法律效力来源于公法规定而非标准本身,该强制性是公法执行上的强制性而非私法适用上的强制性。技术标准的“规范性法律效力”并非标准的法律效力,而是法律本身的效力。在立法、执法和司法过程中,特定事实需要借助标准予以重构或建构后,方能以可接受的成本为法律所识别,此乃标准可以在法律中被援引的根本原因。在行政执法和司法裁判的大部分案件中,基于能力和成本的考虑,宜尊重标准的合理定型功能;如果个案中确实存在更好的合理定型事实的工具,则应当用此种工具取代之。
    英文摘要:
    The standardization process is the rationalization process of the integration of science and technology and value judgment. Technical standards constitute a normative system that reasonably shapes the production process, and product or environmental quality. They are among the standards with the most concentrated quantitative indexes and the most frequent interaction with law. Technical standards are not public law norms. Their function is to provide a kind of reference provision of reasonable stereotype, whether for public law or for private law. The legal effect of mandatory standards comes from provisions of public law rather than the standards themselves, and the standards are mandatory in the implementation of public law rather than in the application of private law. The “normative legal validity” of technical standards is not the legal validity of standards, but the validity of law itself. In the process of legislation, execution and judicature, specific facts need to be constructed or reconstructed with the aid of standards before they can be recognized by law at an acceptable cost, and this is the fundamental reason why standards could or should be cited in laws. In most cases of administrative law execution and judicial adjudication, the function of reasonable shaping of standards should be respected in the consideration of capacity and cost. If a better method does exist in a case, it should replace the function of the standard.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成