贿赂犯罪治理策略的定量研究
赵军贿赂犯罪治理策略的定量研究
A Quantitative Research on the Control Strategy of Bribery Crime
期刊名称:《法学研究》
期刊年份:
作者:赵军
单位:北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院
中文关键词:贿赂犯罪;受贿罪;行贿罪;企业合规;定量研究
英文关键词:crime of bribery; crime of taking bribery; crime of offering bribery; corporate compliance; quantitative research
中文摘要:
定量研究显示,配刑与宽宥对称设置的惩治模式以及不对称程度较低的惩治模式,均无法有效压制受贿冲动,难以取得对贿赂犯罪的良好抑制效果;容忍、放任贿赂的组织文化和社会环境是受贿、行贿倾向的共同促成因素,对权力缺乏有效监督与限制是受贿倾向的特别促成因素;以行贿是受贿的“源头”为由,要求加重处罚行贿或者要求行贿与受贿“同罪同罚”的主张,与经验事实不符;不对称重罚受贿并且附条件大幅度宽宥行贿的设计,对贿赂犯罪具有最佳抑制效果。在坚持“受贿行贿一起查”但不同等处理二者的同时,应积极展开“特别污点证人豁免”制度、企业合规激励机制的尝试与探索,以此疏通涉企业贿赂犯罪打击与治理、治标与治本的中间管道。强化对权力的监督与限制,改善营商环境,是治理贿赂犯罪最关键、最艰巨、最具决定意义的系统工程。
英文摘要:
This quantitative study shows that the punishment mode with the symmetrical or low-asymmetrical setting of statutory sentence and leniency policy cannot effectively suppress the impulse of bribe-taking, and is unable to achieve a good inhibitory effect on bribery crimes. The organizational culture and social environment that tolerate bribery are the common contributing factors of both the tendency to offer bribes and the tendency to take bribes and the lack of effective supervision and restriction on power is the special contributing factor of the bribe-taking tendency. The proposition of raising the statutory sentence for bribe-offering or balancing the statutory sentence of bribe-offering and bribe-taking, which rests on the assumption that bribe-offering is the source of bribe-taking, is inconsistent with the empirical facts. Asymmetrically setting more severe statutory penalties for bribe-taking and formulating more conditionally lenient policies for bribe-offering have the best inhibitory effect on bribery crimes. While adhering to the principle of “investigating the offering and taking of bribes together” instead of “equal treatment”, China should actively carry out the trial and exploration of the “special immunity for tainted witness” system and corporate compliance incentive mechanism, so as to unclog the intermediate channels between the crackdown and control of bribery crimes involving private enterprises and between the treatment of symptoms and the treatment of root causes. Strengthening the supervision over and restriction of power and improving the business environment are the most critical, arduous and decisive systematic projects in the control of bribery crimes.
全文阅读: 点击下载