履行行政职责的作为可能性

林鸿潮

履行行政职责的作为可能性

Possibility of the Act in Performing Administrative Duties


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:林鸿潮
    单位:中国政法大学法治政府研究院
    中文关键词:行政职责;可问责性;行政不作为;作为可能性
    英文关键词:administrative duty; accountability; administrative omission; possibility of act
    中文摘要:
    有关行政机关履职评价的既有理论和制度,聚焦于对作为义务和结果回避可能性的考察,而未真正涉及对行政机关作为可能性的讨论。相关理论假定,立法已经解决了行政职责和行政能力的匹配问题,或相关权责安排已通过民主立法程序得到正当化。但是,我国立法机关对行政资源的配置并不享有实质上的决定权,目标与能力不匹配的行政任务在我国法律中大量存在。要准确评价行政机关的履职状况,在考察作为义务、结果回避可能性之外,还需将分散在机构编制管理、预算、规划等体系中的行政资源配置情况进行“拼组”,综合考虑行政资源的可及性、充足性及其与行政任务的匹配度,确定对行政机关作为可能性的合理预期。在不(完全)具备作为可能性的情况下,应结合行政机关是否采取了替代性履职方案、是否积极调剂其他行政资源、是否合理调节了公众预期等因素,最终评价其履职情况并确定其责任。
    英文摘要:
    The existing theories and systems related to the performance evaluation of administrative organs focus on the investigation of the duty of act and the possibility to avoid the consequence, but do not really involve the discussion of the possibility of act. Relevant theories assume that the problem of the match between administrative duties and administrative capacities has been solved by legislation or that relevant power and responsibility arrangements have been justified through democratic legislative procedures. However, Chinese legislature does not have the substantive power to decide on the allocation of administrative resources and there are many administrative tasks in Chinese law whose goals and capacities do not match. To accurately evaluate the performance of an administrative organ, in addition to examining the duty of act and the possibility to avoid the consequence, it is also necessary to integrate the allocation of administrative resources scattering in the system of organization management, budget, planning and so on, comprehensively consider the accessibility and adequacy of administrative resources and their degree of match with administrative tasks, and determine the reasonable expectation of the possibility of act of the administrative organ. In the case of impossibility or incomplete possibility of act, the duty performance of an administrative organ should be evaluated and its liability should be determined in light of such factors as whether it has adopted an alternative performance plan, whether it has actively requested other administrative resources, and whether it has reasonably adjusted public expectations.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成