数字时代的技术性正当程序：理论检视与制度构建
苏宇数字时代的技术性正当程序：理论检视与制度构建
echnological Due Processinthe Digital Age: TheoryInspection and System Construction
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：苏宇
单位：
中文关键词：技术性正当程序;数字政府;自动化行政;智能决策;程序正义
英文关键词：technical due process; digital government; automated administration; intelligent decision-making; procedural justice
中文摘要：
伴随数字时代信息技术的高速发展和自动化行政的广泛应用，行政法中的正当程序模态正面临全方位的挑战。通过一系列制度方案，对包括行政相对人在内的社会公众予以全过程、全方位的赋能，是确保人在自动化行政过程中充分享有正当程序保障的关键。以赋能为核心旨趣，以提升人的信息能力和行动能力为出发点，技术性正当程序的既有实践和理论主张可被重构为一套理想化模型，这一模型具体包含全程参与、原理公开、充分告知、有效交流、留存记录、人工审查六方面内容。我国立法实践中已有不少能够体现技术性正当程序内在价值的制度设计，未来还需探索建立层次化的原理解释机制、标准化的记录留存机制、结构化的人工介入机制，形成技术性正当程序的完整制度方案。
英文摘要：
With the rapid development of information technology in the digital age and the extensive application of automated administration, the due process model in the administrative law is facing multifaceted challenges. By empowering the public as well as the administrative counterparts within the whole administrative process through a series of intricately designed institutions, sufficient protection of the due process can be guaranteed in the process of automated administration. With empowerment as the core purpose and improvement of abilities in both information and action as the starting point, the existing practice and theoretical advocations of technical due process can be reconstructed into an idealized model with the following six aspects, that is, participation in the whole process, disclosure of fundamentals, full notification, effective communication, record retention, and manual review. As legislative practice of China has already presented quite a few institutional designs that reflect the intrinsic value of technical due process, it is necessary to carry out deeper explorations into such issues as establishing hierarchical interpretation mechanisms, standardized record retention mechanisms and structured manual intervention mechanisms, so as to form a complete institutional scheme for technical due process.
全文阅读： 点击下载
