数据公平利用的法理反思与制度重构

丁晓东

数据公平利用的法理反思与制度重构

Jurisprudential Reflections on and Institutional Reconstruction of Fair Use of Data


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:丁晓东
    单位:
    中文关键词:数据利用;数据确权;数据访问与利用权;数据治理;数字经济
    英文关键词:data usage; comfirmation of data rights; data access and usage right; data governance; digital economy
    中文摘要:
    在当前的数据交易与利用实践中,数据作为关键性生产要素,主要为少数企业所控制,作为用户的个人与中小商家则难以利用数据。为实现数据的公平利用,欧盟试图赋予用户以数据访问与利用权,美国注重个人信息数据的市场交易,我国则强调对企业数据进行确权。然而,数据具有聚合性、关联性、场景依附性、非竞争性与非排他性等特征,确权无助于解决数据利用过程中的争议,将数据视为权益混同的聚合型财产,通过行为规制与数据治理实现数据公平利用,是更为合理可行的路径。对于商业主体数据的利用,应强调市场自治与竞争秩序公平。对于个人数据的利用,应从“个人—企业”“个人集合—企业”两个关系维度构建和完善数据治理规则。对于公开数据的利用,应克减平台企业的数据控制权,赋予平台内商家以有限的数据访问与利用权,保障平台内个人用户的个人信息携带权,以有效平衡各方主体间的利益关系。
    英文摘要:
    In the current practice of data trading and usage, data, as a key element of production, is mainly controlled by a small number of enterprises and it is difficult for individuals and small and medium-sized businesses to use it. In order to realize the fair use of data, the European Union grants users the right to access and use data, the United States attaches importance to the market transaction of personal information data, while China emphasizes the comfirmation of rights to enterprise data. Data, however, has the characteristics of being aggregational, relational, scenario-dependent, non-competitive and non-exclusive, and comfirmation of data rights of different subjects does not help to resolve disputes in the process of data usage. It is more reasonable and feasible to treat data as an aggregated property with mixed rights and interests and achieve fair use of data through behavior regulation and data governance. For the use of commercial entities’ data, market autonomy and fair competition order should be emphasized. For the use of personal data, data governance rules should be constructed and improved in the two dimensions of “the individual vs. the enterprise” and “the collective vs. the enterprise”. For the use of public data, it is necessary to derogate the platform’s control right on data, grant commercial users limited data access and usage rights, and guarantee the individual’s right to data portability, so as to effectively balance the interest relationships between different parties.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成