数字公民的身份确认及权利保障

马长山

数字公民的身份确认及权利保障

Identification of Digital Citizens and Protection of Their Rights


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:马长山
    单位:
    中文关键词:数字法治;数字公民;数字政府;数字人权;数字权利
    英文关键词:digital rule of law; digital citizens; digital government; digital human rights; digital rights
    中文摘要:
    数字化生存已成为人类生活的基本属性与核心机制,数字公民身份问题由此应运而生。数字公民是自然公民的数字化身与数字表达,承载着数字公共生活中的公民身份、行动逻辑和权利义务关系。数字赋能和技术赋权的不平衡,导致数字公民遭遇机制性游离困境,这具体表现为平台构架中数字公民的边缘化、算法决策中数字公民的离场化、数字控制中数字公民的对象化、技术赋权中数字公民的失能化、技术理性中数字公民的去人化等。数字公民的机制性游离,对公民的平等自由、基本权利和民主法治价值形成了严峻挑战。消解数字公民的机制性游离,加强数字公民权利的法治化保障,维护数字社会的公平正义,需要坚持“以人为本”的数字法治原则,实现数字公民身份的合法化确认,构建包容共治的数字民主机制,提升数字公民的素养能力。
    英文摘要:
    Being digital has become a fundamental attribute and core mechanism of human life and, as a result, digital citizenship has emerged. Digital citizens are the digital incarnation and the digital expression of natural citizens, carrying citizenship, action logic, and the relationships of rights and obligations in digital public life. The imbalance between digital empowerment and technological empowerment has led to the dilemma of institutional dissociation of digital citizens, specifically manifested in the marginalization of digital citizens in the platform framework, the disengagement of digital citizens in the algorithm decision-making, the objectification of digital citizens in the digital control, the disablement of digital citizens in the technological empowerment, and the dehumanization of digital citizens in the technological rationality. The institutional dissociation of digital citizens poses a serious challenge to the equality, freedom and basic rights of citizens as well as to the values of democracy and the rule of law. To eliminate the institutional dissociation of digital citizens, strengthen the legal protection of the rights of digital citizens, and uphold the fairness and justice of digital society, it is necessary to adhere to the principle of "people-oriented" digital rule of law, realize the confirmation of the legality of digital citizenship, build an inclusive and co-governed digital democracy mechanism, and enhance the accomplishment and ability of digital citizens.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成