私法效果的弹性化机制——以不合意、错误与合同解释为例

私法效果的弹性化机制——以不合意、错误与合同解释为例

The Flexible Mechanism of Private Law Effect

    期刊名称：《法学研究》
    期刊年份：
    作者：叶金强
    单位：南京大学法学院
    中文关键词：要件的动态化;不合意;错误;合同解释;弹性化
    英文关键词：dynamic requirements;non-meeting of minds;mistake;interpretation of contract;flexibility
    中文摘要：
    刚性的“要件一效果”模式,易导致个案的非正义。私法效果的弹性化,可透过要件的动态化而实现。合意与否、错误与否的判断,需在信赖合理性与归责性比较权衡的基础上透过合同解释来完成。合同解释为要件的动态化提供了场域。合同解释中,通过信赖合理性和归责性要件动态化的比较权衡,可分别得出:不合意且无责任、不合意同时承担缔约过失责任、合意且有错误而可撤销、合意虽有错误但不可撤销等结论,从而实现法律效果的弹性化。
    英文摘要：
    The rigid "requirements-effects" mode sometimes leads to injustice in given cases. The flexibility of legal effects in private law could be realized by the dynamic requirements. The judgment of whether there is a meeting of minds or whether there is a mistake shall be reached by interpretation of contract on the basis of comparing and weighing the reasonableness of reliance and zurechenbarkeito The interpretation of contract provides a space for the dynamic requirements. By the dynamic process of reasonableness of reliance and zurechenbarkeit in contract interpretation, comparing and weighing, various conclusions could be reached including non-meeting of minds and no liability, non-meeting of minds and pre-contract liability,meeting of minds with mistakes and revocable, and meeting of minds without mistake and irrevocable. Such are the realization of the flexibility of legal effects.
    全文阅读：  点击下载