案卷笔录中心主义——对中国刑事审判方式的重新考察

陈瑞华

案卷笔录中心主义——对中国刑事审判方式的重新考察

On the Trial Mode Centralized on Files and Notes


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:陈瑞华
    单位:北京大学法学院
    中文关键词:案卷笔录;审判方式;庭后阅卷;证据法
    英文关键词:files and notes;the trial mode;reviewing the files after trial;evidence law
    中文摘要:
    中国刑事审判中存在着一种“以案卷笔录为中心”的审判方式。在这一审判方式下,公诉方通过宣读案卷笔录来主导和控制法庭调查过程,法庭审判成为对案卷笔录的审查和确认程序,不仅各项控方证据的可采性是不受审查的,而且其证明力也被作出了优先选择。结果。现代刑事证据规则在这种审判方式下难以有存在的基础,法庭审理只能流于形式,那种通过当庭审判来形成裁判结论的机制和文化难以形成。不抛弃这种案卷笔录中心主义的审判方式,任何以加强庭审功能为宗旨的司法改革将没有存在的空间。
    英文摘要:
    There is a trial mode centralized on the files and notes existing in Chinese criminal trial.In this trial mode, the public prosecutors dominate and wntrol the whole hearing in trial by reading the files and notes, and the trial of court becomes into a procedure of reviewing and affirming the files and notes, thus not only the admission of the prosecution'evidences is not reviewed, but also the proving force of these evidences is preferred. As a result,the modern rule of criminal evidence loses basis for its existence, and the trial proceeding of court can't play the role that it should do, and the mechanism and culture in which judgments are reached by trial in court couldn't mme into form. If we don't discard this trial mode centralized on the files and notes, any judicial reform to exert the function of trial in court will not find a room for existence.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成