对常见犯罪量刑基准的经验分析

王利荣

对常见犯罪量刑基准的经验分析

Sentencing Benchmark of Common Crime


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:王利荣
    单位:西南政法大学
    中文关键词:常见犯罪;基准事实;基准刑量;等重线
    英文关键词:common crimes;norm facts;sentencing benchmark
    中文摘要:
    确立量刑基准旨在厘清量刑步骤和常见规则。个罪基准刑的确定应当以司法解释、法院量刑指导意见中类型化经验和指导性案例中具体经验为基础;基准刑对应的基准事实应是既遂状态下反映该罪特有手段或者实害程度的事实;基准刑即使重合于法定刑中间线也不宜确立中线论的指导地位。选择确立常见犯罪的量刑基准不仅是回应现实需要,借此划分等重线,还能避免因过度技术化而反受其累。
    英文摘要:
    Establishing the sentencing benchmark is to clarify the process and common rules of sentence. According to our sentencing theory, the logical initial point to discuss sentencing process is the constitutional facts. But in fact, the theoretical model to determine the nature of an offense could not provide the concrete process of sentence. The norm facts corresponding the norm sentence should be such verities which could reflect the specific mean and infringing extent of the crime. It will be in accordance with the cognitive laws of“from objectivity to subjectivity”and“from phenomena to essence”to take the norm facts as the objective fundamental of sentence.The establishment of the sentencing benchmark of a specific crime should be based on the criminal judicial interpretation made by Supreme People’s Court and the type experiences in the sentencing guidance of local people’s courts. They are the main way of centralizing and typing the sentencing experiences. Without such original forms of experiences, only confusion can be achieved in exploring the norm facts and sentencing benchmark. Where they are not enough to guide the specific sentence, the conclusions and reasons made by judges in instructive cases should be intensively considered, from which one should find technique rules of sentence which can withstand the rational inquiry. It is unrealistic and unnecessary to establish the sentencing benchmark and corresponding norm facts of each of the more than 400 accusations in the Criminal Law and its amendments, since common crimes are more frequent in judicial trial, and it is less difficult to sum up their sentencing experiences and clear up their sentencing process.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成