程序法视野中冲突规则的适用模式

宋晓

程序法视野中冲突规则的适用模式

Application Mode of Conflict Rule from the Perspective of Civil Procedure


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:宋晓
    单位:南京大学法学院
    中文关键词:冲突规则;程序法;依职权适用;任意性适用
    英文关键词:conflict rule;procedural law;application ex officio;facultative application
    中文摘要:
    程序法视角和程序法原理对于分析冲突规则依职权适用抑或任意性适用的问题虽必不可少,但程序处分主义和辩论主义均不能成为冲突规则任意性适用的基础。在法官依职权适用冲突规则的制度下,必须强化法官对冲突规则以及相关法律适用问题的释明义务,以防发生突袭裁判,并由当事人证明外国法。只有依职权适用而非任意性适用冲突规则,才能最大限度地维护当事人依据国际私法体系所享有的法律适用的权利。
    英文摘要:
    Private international law, an indivisible part of each legal system, should have the same dignity and value as any other legal field. Consequently, conflict rules should be applied by judges ex officio rather than at the mercy of the parties. Neither the dispositive principle nor the adversarial principle nor a practical caring for the procedural interests of parties provides a strong argument for the facultative application of conflict rules. From the perspective of procedural law, however, the related rules of civil procedure should be taken into consideration in the analysis of the application mode of conflict rules.When the conflict rules are applied by judges ex officio, it is the judges’responsibility to disclose to the parties any information about the related conflict rules and the applicable law referred to. On the other hand, the parties should bear the duty to prove foreign law. The procedural interests of both parties will be best protected by this approach. The ex officio application of conflict rules does not mean any mandatory application of foreign law which conflict rules refer to. This mode does not neglect the will of parties on whether to apply foreign law, nor does it disregard the weighing of the costs and gains of applying foreign law by parties.The ex officio application of conflict rules is proximately a “procedural process”. Its crucial function or purpose is that, when conflict rules or the applicable foreign law does not invoked by the parties initiatively, judges will disclose the law application problem to the parties and urge them to think it carefully. Consequently, the parties’right to apply foreign law will not be renounced due to their ignorance, incompetence or negligence. This mode will mostly protect the parties’rights under both international private law and substantive law.To make it clear to accept the ex officio application of conflict rules, which denotes to regard foreign legal systems as equal to ourselves and protect international private law order on conflict law rather than lex fori, will serve as a symbol of the magnanimity which China should show to the outside world as a great power.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成