裸刑均值的意义

白建军

裸刑均值的意义

Mean of Declaratory Sentence of Crime without Statutory Sentencing Factors and Its Significance


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:白建军
    单位:北京大学法学院
    中文关键词:量刑;裸刑均值;判例
    英文关键词:sentencing;mean of declaratory sentence of crime without statutory factor;case
    中文摘要:
    量刑的实际水平到底低于、等于还是高于法定刑轻重程度,是立法与司法之间诸多关系之一。以21省市77家法院7万多刑事裁量为样本进行观察,可以得出量刑的实际水平显著低于法定刑中线的结论。这个结论可引发一系列理论思考,并成为我国模范判例制度的依据之一。
    英文摘要:
    Basing on the study of criminal judgments for 70,000 cases from 77 courts of 21 provinces and municipalities, this paper intends to answer the question of the relationship between practical sentencing status and statutory sentencing range of Chinese Criminal Law. According to this research, the mean of declaratory sentences of those cases without consideration of any statutory sentencing factor is generally lower than the median of their statutory sentencing range.Lower than the median of statutory range, as a group choice of judges, such mean is both legitimate and reasonable. In fact, the sentencing benchmark in the “Sentencing Advisory Guidelines of People’s Court” issued by the Supreme People’s Court of China is also significantly lower than the median of statutory range. According to this research, once we take the provisions from Criminal Law and Sentencing Advisory Guidelines as the dominant sentencing benchmark, then, the practical mean of declaratory sentence of crime without statutory factors can be deemed as the recessive sentencing benchmark, the third frame of reference for sentencing practice. By following this, we never intend to restrict judges’discretional act, instead, we offer better choices for them. This policy of persuasion, through respecting the activity of judges and encouraging them to be close to the average of judicial practice, will lead individual judge to keep consistency with other judges. Still, it can effectively avoid the whirlwind of ups and downs in sentencing practice. Furthermore, the mean of declaratory sentence of crime without statutory factors can learn actively and be adjusted passively. All in all, the plan of abstracting such mean from good-sized model cases should be an active experiment of absorbing the essential parts of common law into our statutory law system.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成