法律现实主义与转型社会刑事司法

胡铭

法律现实主义与转型社会刑事司法

Legal Realism and Criminal Justicein Transitional Society


    期刊名称:《法学研究》
    期刊年份:
    作者:胡铭
    单位:浙江大学光华法学院
    中文关键词:法律现实主义;转型社会;刑事司法
    英文关键词:legal realism;transitional society;judicial reform;criminal procedure
    中文摘要:
    我国社会正处于转型期,各种社会矛盾凸显,刑事司法面临着新的挑战。西方的法律现实主义能为我国转型期刑事司法提供可资借鉴的方法论和改革思路。法律现实主义运动在批评形式主义与三段论式审判的基础上,把法律看作具有多重目标的社会引擎,关注司法行为、纠纷解决与社会问题。在中国语境下,引入法律现实主义,不是要简单地否定形式主义,而是应理性对待形式主义并在其中融入客观主义;应在刑事司法裁判中适用利益权衡,重视经验归纳而不拘泥于简单的演绎推理;应以实现社会正义为核心,构建合理衔接的多元纠纷解决机制。
    英文摘要:
    Legal realism is a family of theories about the nature of law developed in the first half of the 20th century in the United States and Scandinavia. The essential tenet of legal realism is that all law is made by human beings and is therefore subject to human foibles, frailties and imperfections. It has become quite common today to identify Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes as the main precursor of American Legal Realism. For Chinese criminal justice system, it is a new, helpful and realistic topic.China is a pluralistic society in its transitional period now, and the social conflicts are very serious, which is a big challenge for Chinese criminal justice system. Western legal realists criticize formalism and syllogistic type of trial, look law as a society engine with multiple targets, and pay attention to justice behaviors, disputes resolution and social issues as well. In Chinese circumstance, legal realism does not mean to deny formalism, but mean that we should rationally treat formalism and blend objectivism in it. Moreover, interest balance should be applied in criminal judgments and attentions should be paid to experience summarizing beyond simple deductive reasoning. Legal realism also means that we should focus on turning social justice into reality and constructing a pluralistic disputes resolution mechanism with the litigation system and the alternative one well-connected. Anyway, legal realism is not a panacea for Chinese criminal judicial reform, but can provide a methodological guidance for it, especially for solving extreme social conflicts and disputes. In a word, it will be a very helpful theory for Chinese criminal justice system in transitional period.
    全文阅读:  点击下载

相关文章!
  • 中国数据跨境调取路径探析——以

    特定情况下的数据跨境调取需要在传统的司法互助协定方式基础上补充其他路径。中国在坚持以双边司法互助协定和互惠原则为主要方式的基

  • 折中主义与理想主义之辩——评西

    美国西蒙尼德斯教授在新著的《全球冲突法立法:国际比较研究》一书中,提出晚近国际私法背离了萨维尼理论所追求的理想主义,呈现折中主义

  • 离岸信托避税规制的域外经验及

    作为信托的类型之一,离岸信托是指根据外国法律设立的信托。在信托本身固有的灵活机制之上,离岸信托充分利用了离岸管辖区的税收优势,成