构成要件：犯罪论体系核心概念的反拨与再造
陈兴良构成要件：犯罪论体系核心概念的反拨与再造
Tatbestand: Reversion and Redefinition of the Core Concept of Systemon Crime
期刊名称：《法学研究》
期刊年份：
作者：陈兴良
单位：北京大学法学院
中文关键词：构成要件;犯罪构成;罪状;罪体
英文关键词：Tatbestand;constitutive elements of a crime;fact about a crime;actus rea
中文摘要：
构成要件是犯罪论体系的核心概念，它是犯罪论体系建构的逻辑起点。我国的四要件的犯罪构成理论在从苏俄引入之初，就延续了苏俄学者对构成要件的误解，将具有特殊意蕴的构成要件理解为犯罪成立的一般条件，由此与具有阶层性的三要件的犯罪论体系分道扬镳，走上了一条完全不同的理论道路。在当前三阶层与四要件的犯罪论体系的争论中，阶层性的有无是两者的根本区分，而造成这一区分的根本原因就在于对构成要件的不同理解。只有追本溯源地澄清构成要件的概念，了解构成要件的演变径路，才能为我国犯罪论体系的重构提供理论资源。
英文摘要：
Tatbestand is the logical start and core concept of the theoretical system on crime. This paper explores the conceptual history of the theory of Tatbestand, in which it confirms Beling’s historical contributions and points out three characteristics of his theory of Tatbestand, i. e., the guiding function of Tatbestand, which provides objective contour for the crime, the type characteristic of Tatbestand, which to a large extent determines the types of crimes, and the objective nature of Tatbestand. Although the theory of Tatbestand has experienced great changes since Beling, the most important historical stage for this theory was the period from Beling to Feuerbach, and its following development has taken the conception established by Beling as a logical start. However, Soviet scholars transformed Tatbestand into the constitutive elements of a crime, thus transformed Tatbestand from the premise of a crime into the sum of the constitutive elements of a crime, which has eradicated the influence of the Tatbestand. Therefore, the four-element system on crime is a theory without Tatbestand.Since the early stage when China introduced the four-element system on crime from Soviet Union, Chinese scholars continued the misunderstanding of the concept of Tatbestand, looking Tatbestand as the general conditions for the constitution of a crime, which has led Chinese theory of crime to a completely different way from the three-stage system on crime. The introduction of Beling’s the theory of Tatbestand, especially the introduction of the three-stage system on crime, domesticated as the theory of definition, the theory of conduct and the theory of actus rea by some Chinese scholars, makes it possible to make an objective comparison between the four-element system on crime and the three-stage system on crime and provides another possibility for the development of criminal theory in China.
全文阅读： 点击下载
